SEJARAH PERKEMBANGAN FILSAFAT ILMU KLASIK PERTENGAHAN MODERN DAN KONTEMPORER

sejarah perkembangan filsafat ilmu klasik pertengahan modern dan kontemporer

Authors

  • sekarardhanun Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • abdurrazaq Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
  • kristinaimron Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38973

Keywords:

Philosophy of science, Intellectual history, Classical

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the historical development of the philosophy of science
from the classical, medieval, modern, to contemporary periods, as well as to
examine the contribution of each period in shaping contemporary scientific
paradigms. This study is based on the understanding that the philosophy of science
cannot be separated from the dynamics of human intellectual history and the social,
cultural, and intellectual contexts surrounding it. The research employs a library
research method with a historical-philosophical approach through comparative
analysis of the thoughts of philosophers and key works in the philosophy of science
across different historical periods. Data are obtained from relevant academic
literature, including books and scholarly journal articles. The findings indicate that
during the classical period, the philosophy of science emphasized the search for the
essence of knowledge through rationality and logic as the foundation of scientific
inquiry. The medieval period was characterized by a synthesis of Greek philosophy
and theological traditions in both Islamic and Christian thought, resulting in an
understanding of knowledge as a unity of reason and revelation. The modern period
marked a significant shift toward rationalism, empiricism, and the development of
scientific methods based on observation and experimentation, leading to the
separation of philosophy from science. Meanwhile, the contemporary period is
characterized by criticism of positivism, the emergence of methodological pluralism,
and critical reflections on ethical, social, and cultural dimensions of scientific
practice. This study concludes that the development of the philosophy of science is
dynamic and contextual, making historical understanding essential for building a
critical and reflective scientific framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad Zainal Abidin, ‘Studi

Kepustakaan Dalam Penelitian

Filsafat Ilmu,’ Refleksi: Jurnal

Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam, Vol.

21, No. 1, 2021, Hlm. 33–35.

Alan Chalmers, ‘Rationalism and

Empiricism in Modern Science,’

Science & Education, Vol. 30,

2021, Hlm. 689–692.

Asy, Ary, and Mahfudz Ridwan.

“Jurnal Studi Islam Dan

Kemuhammadiyahan ( JASIKA )

Melacak Perkembangan Filsafat

Ilmu : Tinjauan Historis Dan

Logika Penalaranya” 4, no. 1

(2024): 1–16.

Asyha, Agus Faisal, Agus Pahrudin,

and Agus Munawar. “Philosophy

of Science and Philosophy of

Science Review : Historical

Analysis and Perspectives of

Ontology , Epistemology , and

Axiology,” 2021.

Ayman Shihadeh, ‘Avicenna’s

Conception of Science,’ Arabic

Sciences and Philosophy, Vol.

30, No. 2, 2020, Hlm. 235–238.

Carlo Natali, ‘Aristotle and the

Scientific Method,’ Journal of the

History of Philosophy, Vol. 59,

No. 2, 2021, Hlm. 245–248.

Daniel C. Dennett, ‘Philosophy of

Science and Its Historical

Context,’ Philosophy & Social

Criticism, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2021,

Hlm. 673–676.

Hasok Chang, ‘The Problem of

Scientific Specialization,’

European Journal for Philosophy

of Science, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021,

Hlm. 1–4.

Heather Douglas, ‘The Value-

Ladenness of Science,’

Philosophy of Science, Vol. 87,

No. 5, 2020, Hlm. 1043–1046.

Islam, Universitas, and Negeri

Alauddin. “Sejarah

Perkembangan Filsafat Ilmu” 1,

no. Endraswara 2021 (2024): 33–

39.

James Lennox, ‘Aristotle’s Philosophy

of Science Reconsidered,’

Synthese, Vol. 198, 2021, Hlm.

5123–5126.

John Marenbon, ‘Medieval Philosophy

and the Sciences,’ Journal of

Medieval Philosophy, Vol. 5,

2020, Hlm. 89–92.

Luciano Floridi, ‘Philosophy of

Information and Science,’

Synthese, Vol. 198, 2021, Hlm.1127–1130.

Lydia Patton, ‘Why History Matters in

Philosophy of Science,’ Studies in

History and Philosophy of

Science, Vol. 89, 2021, Hlm. 1–4.

Mariyah, Siti, and Ahmad Syukri.

“Filsafat Dan Sejarah

Perkembangan Ilmu” 4, no. 3

(2021): 242–46.

Martin Kusch, ‘Historical Epistemology

and Scientific Knowledge,’

Studies in History and Philosophy

of Science, Vol. 90, 2021, Hlm.

67–70.

Michela Massimi, ‘Four Kinds of

Perspective,’ Philosophy of

Science, Vol. 88, No. 3, 2021,

Hlm. 401–404.

Miftahul Huda, ‘Periodisasi Dan

Karakteristik Filsafat Ilmu,’ Jurnal

Filsafat, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2021,

Hlm. 55–58.

Nur Hasan, ‘Pendekatan Deskriptif

Dalam Kajian Sejarah Filsafat

Ilmu,’ Jurnal Theologia, Vol. 32,

No. 2, 2021, Hlm. 201–203.

Peter Adamson, ‘Philosophy in the

Islamic World: A Historical

Reassessment,’ British Journal

for the History of Philosophy, Vol.

28, No. 4, 2020, Hlm. 673–676.

Richard McKirahan, ‘Greek

Philosophy and Early Science,’

Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 41, No.

1, 2021, Hlm. 15–18.

Roni Ismail, ‘Metodologi Penelitian

Filsafat: Pendekatan Kualitatif

Dan Studi Kepustakaan,’ Jurnal

Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol. 8, No. 2,

2021, Hlm. 145–147.

Sabina Leonelli, ‘Science,

Responsibility, and Society,’

European Journal for Philosophy

of Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2020,

Hlm. 1–4.

Sandra Harding, ‘Post-Positivist

Philosophy of Science,’ Hypatia,

Vol. 35, No. 4, 2020, Hlm. 681–

684.

Steven Shapin, ‘The Scientific

Revolution Revisited,’ Social

Studies of Science, Vol. 50, No. 4,

2020, Hlm. 481–484.

Syaiful Anwar Dan Lailatul Qadri,

‘Analisis Data Kualitatif Dalam

Penelitian Kepustakaan,’ Jurnal

Al-Tahrir, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2022,

Hlm. 289–292.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30