SEJARAH PERKEMBANGAN FILSAFAT ILMU KLASIK PERTENGAHAN MODERN DAN KONTEMPORER
sejarah perkembangan filsafat ilmu klasik pertengahan modern dan kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38973Keywords:
Philosophy of science, Intellectual history, ClassicalAbstract
This study aims to analyze the historical development of the philosophy of science
from the classical, medieval, modern, to contemporary periods, as well as to
examine the contribution of each period in shaping contemporary scientific
paradigms. This study is based on the understanding that the philosophy of science
cannot be separated from the dynamics of human intellectual history and the social,
cultural, and intellectual contexts surrounding it. The research employs a library
research method with a historical-philosophical approach through comparative
analysis of the thoughts of philosophers and key works in the philosophy of science
across different historical periods. Data are obtained from relevant academic
literature, including books and scholarly journal articles. The findings indicate that
during the classical period, the philosophy of science emphasized the search for the
essence of knowledge through rationality and logic as the foundation of scientific
inquiry. The medieval period was characterized by a synthesis of Greek philosophy
and theological traditions in both Islamic and Christian thought, resulting in an
understanding of knowledge as a unity of reason and revelation. The modern period
marked a significant shift toward rationalism, empiricism, and the development of
scientific methods based on observation and experimentation, leading to the
separation of philosophy from science. Meanwhile, the contemporary period is
characterized by criticism of positivism, the emergence of methodological pluralism,
and critical reflections on ethical, social, and cultural dimensions of scientific
practice. This study concludes that the development of the philosophy of science is
dynamic and contextual, making historical understanding essential for building a
critical and reflective scientific framework.
Downloads
References
Ahmad Zainal Abidin, ‘Studi
Kepustakaan Dalam Penelitian
Filsafat Ilmu,’ Refleksi: Jurnal
Filsafat Dan Pemikiran Islam, Vol.
21, No. 1, 2021, Hlm. 33–35.
Alan Chalmers, ‘Rationalism and
Empiricism in Modern Science,’
Science & Education, Vol. 30,
2021, Hlm. 689–692.
Asy, Ary, and Mahfudz Ridwan.
“Jurnal Studi Islam Dan
Kemuhammadiyahan ( JASIKA )
Melacak Perkembangan Filsafat
Ilmu : Tinjauan Historis Dan
Logika Penalaranya” 4, no. 1
(2024): 1–16.
Asyha, Agus Faisal, Agus Pahrudin,
and Agus Munawar. “Philosophy
of Science and Philosophy of
Science Review : Historical
Analysis and Perspectives of
Ontology , Epistemology , and
Axiology,” 2021.
Ayman Shihadeh, ‘Avicenna’s
Conception of Science,’ Arabic
Sciences and Philosophy, Vol.
30, No. 2, 2020, Hlm. 235–238.
Carlo Natali, ‘Aristotle and the
Scientific Method,’ Journal of the
History of Philosophy, Vol. 59,
No. 2, 2021, Hlm. 245–248.
Daniel C. Dennett, ‘Philosophy of
Science and Its Historical
Context,’ Philosophy & Social
Criticism, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2021,
Hlm. 673–676.
Hasok Chang, ‘The Problem of
Scientific Specialization,’
European Journal for Philosophy
of Science, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021,
Hlm. 1–4.
Heather Douglas, ‘The Value-
Ladenness of Science,’
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 87,
No. 5, 2020, Hlm. 1043–1046.
Islam, Universitas, and Negeri
Alauddin. “Sejarah
Perkembangan Filsafat Ilmu” 1,
no. Endraswara 2021 (2024): 33–
39.
James Lennox, ‘Aristotle’s Philosophy
of Science Reconsidered,’
Synthese, Vol. 198, 2021, Hlm.
5123–5126.
John Marenbon, ‘Medieval Philosophy
and the Sciences,’ Journal of
Medieval Philosophy, Vol. 5,
2020, Hlm. 89–92.
Luciano Floridi, ‘Philosophy of
Information and Science,’
Synthese, Vol. 198, 2021, Hlm.1127–1130.
Lydia Patton, ‘Why History Matters in
Philosophy of Science,’ Studies in
History and Philosophy of
Science, Vol. 89, 2021, Hlm. 1–4.
Mariyah, Siti, and Ahmad Syukri.
“Filsafat Dan Sejarah
Perkembangan Ilmu” 4, no. 3
(2021): 242–46.
Martin Kusch, ‘Historical Epistemology
and Scientific Knowledge,’
Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science, Vol. 90, 2021, Hlm.
67–70.
Michela Massimi, ‘Four Kinds of
Perspective,’ Philosophy of
Science, Vol. 88, No. 3, 2021,
Hlm. 401–404.
Miftahul Huda, ‘Periodisasi Dan
Karakteristik Filsafat Ilmu,’ Jurnal
Filsafat, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2021,
Hlm. 55–58.
Nur Hasan, ‘Pendekatan Deskriptif
Dalam Kajian Sejarah Filsafat
Ilmu,’ Jurnal Theologia, Vol. 32,
No. 2, 2021, Hlm. 201–203.
Peter Adamson, ‘Philosophy in the
Islamic World: A Historical
Reassessment,’ British Journal
for the History of Philosophy, Vol.
28, No. 4, 2020, Hlm. 673–676.
Richard McKirahan, ‘Greek
Philosophy and Early Science,’
Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 41, No.
1, 2021, Hlm. 15–18.
Roni Ismail, ‘Metodologi Penelitian
Filsafat: Pendekatan Kualitatif
Dan Studi Kepustakaan,’ Jurnal
Ilmu Ushuluddin, Vol. 8, No. 2,
2021, Hlm. 145–147.
Sabina Leonelli, ‘Science,
Responsibility, and Society,’
European Journal for Philosophy
of Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2020,
Hlm. 1–4.
Sandra Harding, ‘Post-Positivist
Philosophy of Science,’ Hypatia,
Vol. 35, No. 4, 2020, Hlm. 681–
684.
Steven Shapin, ‘The Scientific
Revolution Revisited,’ Social
Studies of Science, Vol. 50, No. 4,
2020, Hlm. 481–484.
Syaiful Anwar Dan Lailatul Qadri,
‘Analisis Data Kualitatif Dalam
Penelitian Kepustakaan,’ Jurnal
Al-Tahrir, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2022,
Hlm. 289–292.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.