PENGARUH KOMPETENSI GURU, KEPEMIMPINAN KEPALA SEKOLAH DAN SARANA PRASARANA MELALUI MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA GURU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38462Keywords:
Teacher competence, Work motivation, Teacher performanceAbstract
This study investigates the effects of teacher competence, principal leadership, and school infrastructure on teacher performance, with work motivation serving as a mediating variable, in three public junior high schools in Batealit District. A quantitative causal design was applied using total sampling, involving 59 teachers who completed a Likert-scale questionnaire. Data were analyzed through SEM-PLS. All indicators met validity requirements, with loading factors between 0.701 and 0.876 and AVE values above 0.50 for Teacher Competence (0.607), Principal Leadership (0.635), Infrastructure (0.585), Work Motivation (0.614), and Teacher Performance (0.658). Reliability was exceptionally strong, supported by Cronbach’s Alpha values of 0.945–0.988 and Composite Reliability values of 0.950–0.988. The structural model shows that teacher competence (p = 0.183) and infrastructure (p = 0.201) do not directly influence teacher performance, whereas principal leadership has a significant direct impact (p = 0.005). Work motivation significantly affects teacher performance (p = 0.007) and is influenced by teacher competence (p = 0.029), principal leadership (p = 0.009), and infrastructure (p = 0.040). These three variables also demonstrate significant indirect effects on performance through work motivation, with p-values of 0.033, 0.044, and 0.048. The R² values of 0.612 for work motivation and 0.712 for teacher performance, together with a Q² value of 0.888, indicate strong predictive relevance. The study concludes that work motivation is the primary driver of teacher performance, while principal leadership is the most influential factor. Recommendations emphasize enhancing teacher motivation, strengthening competence development, improving leadership effectiveness, and upgrading infrastructure to support better performance.
Downloads
References
Agustina, L., & Kurniawan, D. (2022). Teacher motivation as a mediator of organizational factors and teacher performance. Journal of Educational Management, 11(2), 145–158.
Akhtar, S., Hashmi, M., & Saeed, B. (2021). Impact of work motivation on teachers’ performance in public secondary schools. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 587–602.
Bandura, A. (2019). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 1–26.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
Hardani et al. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif. Pustaka Ilmu.
Hidayati, N. (2019). School facilities and their influence on teaching effectiveness. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 32–41.
Jannah, N., Nurmayanti, Y., & Hakim, A. (2020). Teacher motivation and performance in Indonesian schools. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 10(2), 112–121.
Korkmaz, S., Erdem, A., & Kiran, M. (2020). School infrastructure as a determinant of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Educational Facilities, 5(1), 55–67.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.
Loureiro, G., Silva, P., & Rodrigues, F. (2023). Teacher motivation, leadership support, and performance in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(4), 721–739.
Misbah, M., Suhaimi, S., & Hartati, N. (2022). Competence, motivation, and teacher performance: A mediating model. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 14(1), 55–68.
Mulyasa, E. (2017). Menjadi kepala sekolah profesional. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nguyen, N., & Habók, A. (2024). Teacher competence and instructional quality in Asian secondary schools. Educational Studies, 50(1), 23–40.
Permendiknas No. 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.
Permendiknas No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana.
Prasetyo, A. (2022). Re-examining the role of motivation in teacher performance. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(2), 201–214.
Purwanto, A., et al. (2020). The role of motivation in mediating organizational factors and teacher performance. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research, 8(3), 134–152.
Rukminingsih, I., et al. (2020). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan kuantitatif. CV Budi Utama.
Santoso, H., & Ramadhan, D. (2023). Transformational leadership and work motivation among teachers. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 9(2), 41–52.
Sari, W., & Wardani, D. (2023). School facilities, motivation, and instructional quality. Jurnal Kependidikan, 17(1), 88–101.
Sumaryanta, Mulyani, M., & Susanto, H. (2018). Teacher competence and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan, 19(2), 145–158.
Surya, M., et al. (2020). Structural equation modeling with PLS in educational research. Jurnal Statistika Terapan, 7(1), 11–20.
Susanto, A., Fadhilah, N., & Hasanah, I. (2021). Determinants of teacher performance: A multivariate analysis. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(3), 221–233.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Uno, H. B. (2016). Profesi kependidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Usman, H., et al. (2020). PLS-SEM for developing educational research models. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 1–15.
Wulandari, E. (2020). School facilities and teacher readiness in learning implementation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 8(2), 77–86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
