Rekonstruksi Pembelajaran Anak Sekolah Dasar Melalui Integrasi Gaya Belajar dan Prinsip Psikologi Pendidikan Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.38129Keywords:
Gaya Belajar, Pembelajaran SD, Psikologi Pendidikan IslamAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi model pembelajaran integratif bagi siswa sekolah dasar melalui penggabungan gaya belajar dan prinsip Psikologi Pendidikan Islam. Pembelajaran SD saat ini menghadapi tantangan heterogenitas peserta didik, sementara praktik pengajaran masih minim personalisasi. Melalui metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan mengikuti pedoman PRISMA 2020, penelitian ini memetakan bukti empiris dan konseptual dari publikasi 2015–2024 pada Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, Google Scholar, dan SINTA. Analisis tematik digunakan untuk mengidentifikasi pola personalisasi, variasi gaya belajar, dan prinsip inti psikologi pendidikan Islam seperti fitrah, tarbiyah, pembiasaan, keteladanan, serta motivasi spiritual. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa gaya belajar (VAK, MI) bermanfaat sebagai variasi instruksional, namun menjadi lebih efektif ketika dipadukan dengan nilai-nilai Islam yang mendukung perkembangan moral dan spiritual anak. Sintesis menghasilkan lima komponen model rekonstruksi: (1) asesmen gaya belajar, (2) penerapan prinsip tarbiyah, (3) aktivitas visual–auditori–kinestetik bernilai islami, (4) lingkungan belajar yang aman dan spiritual, serta (5) evaluasi holistik. Model ini diharapkan memperkuat pembelajaran yang personal, religius, dan bermakna bagi siswa SD serta menjadi dasar pengujian empiris selanjutnya.
Downloads
References
Almazroa, H., & Alotaibi, W. (2023). Teaching 21st Century Skills: Understanding the Depth and Width of the Challenges to Shape Proactive Teacher Education Programmes. Sustainability, Vol. 15, No. 09. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3390/su15097365
Aslaksen, K. (2018). The Modality-Specific Learning Style Hypothesis: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01538
Celik, B., & et al. (2018). The Effect of Multimodal Teaching on Primary School Students’ Academic Achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 06, No. 09. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060914
Clinton-Lisell, V., & Litzinger, C. (2024). Is it Really a Neuromyth? A Meta-Analysis of The Learning Styles Matching Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 15. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1428732
Cuevas, J. (2015). Is Learning Styles-Based Instruction Effective? A Comprehensive Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 107, No. 04. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu00000071
Decristan, J., Fauth, B., Kunter, M., Buttner, G., & Klieme, E. (2017). The Interplay Between Class Heterogeneneity and Teaching Quality in Primary School. Internasional Journal of Education Research, Vol. 86. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.004
Dewi, P. K., & et al. (2023). The Impact of the VAK Model on Elementary Students’ Motivation and Achievement. Walisongo Journal, Vol. 03, No. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.21580/jieed.v3i2.16867
Durlak, J. A., & et al. (2015). The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning. Child Development, Vol. 82, No. 01. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Eikeland, I., & Tollisen, A. (2022). Differentiation in Education: A Configurative Review. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/20020317.2022.2039351
Ferrero, M., Vadillo, M. A., & Leon, S. P. (2021). A Valid Evaluation of The Theory of Multiple Intelligences is Not Yet Possible: Problems of Methodological Quality for Intervention Studies. Intelligence, Vol. 88. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101566
Hamre, B., & et al. (2015). Teacher–Student Interaction and Children’s Engagement in Learning. Elementary School Journal, Vol. 115, No. 03. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/679618
Hassan, A., & Ahmad, S. (2018). Islamic Moral Education and Its Impact on Students’ Learning Motivation. Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 47, No. 04. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1438251
Lickona, T. (2016). Character Education and Moral Development. Journal of Education, Vol. 196, No. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600205
Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The Effectiveness ofTtechnology Supported Personalised Learning in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Meta Analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 52, No. 05. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13116
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muhammad, D. H. (2023). Early Child Education Based on Islamic Psychology. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), Vol. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.54298/ijith.v2i1.51
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 16. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., & Boutron, I. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, Vol. 372. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Pantic, K., & Hamilton, A. (2024). Conducting a Systematic Literature Review in Education: A Basic Approach for Graduate Students. Brock Education Journal/ERIC.
Raihani. (2018). Education for Moral and Spiritual Development in Islamic Schools. Journal of Moral Education, Vol. 47, No. 04. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1438251
Reber, R., Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). Personalized Education to Increase Interest. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 27, No. 06. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0963721418793140
Rogowsky, B. A., Calhoun, B. M., & Tallal, P. (2015). Matching Learning Style to Instructional Method: Effects on Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 107, No. 01. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1037/a0037478
Roorda, D. L., & et al. (2017). Teacher–Student Relationship and Its Associations with Students’ Engagement and Achievement. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 87, No. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, Vol. 07. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1186/s40561-020-00140-9
Siregar, K. (2020). Concept of Islamic Education Psychology in Ihya’ ‘Ulum Al-Din by Al-Ghazali. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 09, No. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.30868/ei.v9i02.1569
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 104. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Suhadi, D., & Nurhayati, L. (2021). Peran Keteladanan Guru dalam Pembentukan Karakter Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, Vol. 12, No. 02. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v12i2.41741
Sun, Z., & et al. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of Higher Education Research Using PRISMA (example article). SAGE. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/2212585X231175164
Tomlison, C. A. (2017). How Differentiated Instruction Improves Learning. Educational Leadership, Vol. 74, No. 07. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434
Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Digital Skills: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, Vol. 10, No. 01. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/2158244019900176
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodological Perspectives and Application. Springer. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
