An Analisis Bahasa Avoidant dalam Interaksi Pendekatan dan Pasca Mendapatkan Pasangan

Authors

  • Rahmadani Rahmadani Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Iqbal Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.37836

Keywords:

Bahasa Avoidant, Interaksi Romantis, Psikolinguistik, Kelekatan, Komunikasi.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristikbahasa yang digunakan oleh individu dengan gaya kelekatanavoidant dalam konteks interaksi romantis, baik pada fasependekatan maupun setelah mendapatkan pasangan. Dari perspektif pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia, artikel inimengkaji bagaimana pilihan leksikal, struktur kalimat, dan strategi komunikasi pragmatis merefleksikan kebutuhan untukmenjaga jarak emosional dan otonomi diri. Artikel ini juga membahas dampak penggunaan bahasa avoidant terhadapdinamika hubungan dan interpretasi calon pasangan, denganharapan dapat memperkaya pemahaman tentang hubunganantara psikologi dan penggunaan bahasa dalam konteksromantis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamsson, P., Boersma, K., & Buhrman, M.. To speak or not to speak? A secondary data analysis to further explore the context-insensitive avoidance scale. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 15, 22-26. Abrahamsson et al., 2024

Brinberg, M., & Ram, N.. Do New Romantic Couples Use More Similar Language Over Time? Evidence from Intensive Longitudinal Text Messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40, 110-128. Brinberg & Ram, 2021

Huang, S. A., & Hancock, J. T.. Will You Go on a Date with Me? Predicting First Dates from Linguistic Traces in Online Dating Messages. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. Huang & Hancock, 2021

Leláková, E., & Praženicová, D.. Exploring Hedging in Spoken Discourse: Insights from Corpus Analysis. XLinguae, 17, 1-17. Leláková & Praženicová, 2024

Lucchesi, F., & Lobinger, K.. Visual interpersonal communication on social network sites in romantic relationships. Communication & Society, 37, 37-51. Lucchesi & Lobinger, 2024

Matz, S., Peters, H., Eastwick, P. W., & Fisher, S. Can Large Language Models Detect Verbal Indicators of Romantic Attraction?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 114, 104593. Matz et al., 2024

Panulaya, T. S., Domingo, D., Pelenio, H., & Adanza, J. L.. Exploring Digital Love: A Conversational Analysis of Online Courtship among Adults. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 64-70. Panulaya et al., 2024

Richardson, E., Beath, A., & Boag, S.. Default defenses: the character defenses of attachment-anxiety and attachment-avoidance. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 39, 167-176. Richardson et al., 2022

Schrage, K. M., Maxwell, J. A., Impett, E. A., & Gable, S. L.. Effects of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Affection on Avoidantly Attached Partners’ Emotions and Message Receptiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1709-1723. Schrage et al., 2020

Seraj, S., Blackburn, K., & Pennebaker, J. W.. Language left behind on social media exposes the emotional and cognitive costs of a romantic breakup. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, e2102031118. Seraj et al., 2021

Sessa, I., D’Errico, F., Poggi, I., & Vinciarelli, A.. Attachment Styles and Communication of Displeasing Truths. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Sessa et al., 2020

Sun, K. Q., & Slepian, M. L.. The conversations we seek to avoid. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 109-122. Sun & Slepian, 2020

Talia, A., Taubner, S., Miller‐Bottome, M., & Fonagy, P.. The in-session discourse of unresolved/disorganized psychotherapy patients: An exploratory study of an attachment classification. Attachment & Human Development, 24, 828-847. Talia et al., 2022

Ully, M. P., & Astari, D. W.. Negotiating Love Languages in Digital Romantic Relationships: A Phenomenological Study of Generation Z Couples in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 25, 1-10. Ully & Astari, 2025

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25