PENGEMBANGAN KURIKULUM MENUJU TRANSFORMASI PENDIDIKAN ABAD KE-21

Authors

  • Putri Neta Nababan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Fira Wibawanti Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Firman Fathulrohman Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Sholeh Hidayat Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.37591

Keywords:

curriculum development, curriculum dimensions, hybrid model

Abstract

The curriculum is the core of the educational system, functioning as a structured guideline that directs all learning processes in a coherent and sustainable manner. However, a gap often exists between the ideal curriculum documents and their factual implementation in the field. This study aims to analyze the basic concepts of curriculum development based on classical and contemporary theories and to formulate a development model relevant to addressing the challenges of 21st-century education. The method used in this article is library research by reviewing various literatures, journals, and policy documents, which were then analyzed using qualitative synthesis of curriculum dimensions. The findings indicate that curriculum development can no longer rely solely on administrative approaches or fragmented grassroots approaches. A cohesive integration between national standards and local flexibility is required. The conclusion of this study recommends the application of a hybrid model approach that combines top-down authority for quality standardization with grass-roots initiative for contextual innovation. The implications of this research demand a paradigm shift for policymakers and educational practitioners to be more adaptive to the hidden curriculum and the dynamics of rapid social change to produce competent and character-filled generations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alberty, H. B. (1953). Reorganizing the High-School Curriculum. New York: Macmillan.

Annala, J., Lindén, J., Mäkinen, M., & Henriksson, J. (2023). Understanding academic agency in curriculum change in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1310–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1881772

Behmanesh, D., Jalilian, S., Heydarabadi, A. B., Ahmadi, M., & Khajeali, N. (2025). The impact of hidden curriculum factors on professional adaptability. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06618-1

Beauchamp, G. A. (1968). Curriculum theory. Kagg Press.

Honkimäki, S., Jääskelä, P., & Tynjälä, P. (2024). Academics’ experiences of university-wide top-down curriculum reform in Finland. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48(6), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2024.2373725

Jaramillo, J. J., & Chiappe, A. (2024). The AI-driven classroom: A review of 21st century curriculum trends. Prospects, 54(3), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-024-09704-w

Kärner, T., & Schneider, G. (2024). A Scoping Review on the Hidden Curriculum in Education. Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives, February. https://doi.org/10.56395/recap.v1i1.1

Oliva, P. F. (2009). Developing the Curriculum (7th ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe.

Romine, D. L. (1945). Curriculum Interpretation in Educational Theory. Educational Review, 97(2), 150–161.

Saylor, J. G., & Alexander, W. M. (1956). Curriculum Planning for Modern Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2000). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press.

UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Wheeler, D. K. (1967). Curriculum process. University of London Press, London.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15