INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PEMBELAJARAN AFEKTIF DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Authors

  • Chandra Nuruliana Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Nufus Tahfidzi Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Enung Nugraha Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Umi Kultsum Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i4.37007

Keywords:

assessment instruments, affective learning, elementary school

Abstract

Learning assessment does not solely focus on the cognitive domain but also includes the affective domain, which relates to students’ attitudes, values, and character development. This article aims to explore the concept of affective learning outcomes, the various affective domains according to Krathwohl’s Taxonomy, relevant operational verbs, and several assessment instruments such as Likert, Thurstone, Guttman, semantic differential, and rating scales. This study employs a descriptive approach using library research by analyzing various academic references. The results indicate that affective assessment plays a crucial role in shaping students’ personality and character. The appropriate use of assessment instruments enables educators to evaluate students’ attitudes and behaviors more objectively, systematically, and comprehensively. Therefore, affective assessment functions not only as an evaluation tool but also as a means of character formation based on moral and spiritual values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Bloom, B. . (ed). (n.d.). Taxonomy of educational objective: the clasification of educational goals. Handbook I cognitive domain. David McKay Company.

Hamalik Oemar. (2006). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bumi Aksara.

Haryono, E., Suprihatiningsih, S., Septian, D., Widodo, J., Ashar, A., & Sariman, S. (2023). Haryono, Eko . “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam .” An-Nuur 13, no. 2 (2023). 2(2).

Hasbi, I. (n.d.). Administrasi Pendidikan (Tinjauan Teori Dan Praktik). Bandung : Widina Bhakti Persada.

Hasil, M., & Siswa, B. (2018). Kata Kunci : Media Pembelajaran dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. 03, 171–187.

Kognitif, P. A., & Psikomotor, D. A. N. (2021). Pengaruh aspek kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotor terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik. 2(1), 1–9.

Kurnia Puspita Sari, Neviyarni S, and I. I. (n.d.). Pengembangan Kreativitas Dan Konsep Diri Anak SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, Vol.7, no.

Nasution, S. (1990). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar-Mengajar. Bina Aksara.

Omar, N. E. al. (n.d.). Automated analysis of exam question according to bloom’s taxonomy. Procedia-Sosial and Behavioral Sciences, 59 (2012) 297-303.

Sudjana, N. dan A. R. (2011). Media Pengajaran. Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Suryadi, B., Suryani, A., & Sri, M. (2017). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Survey Pemasaran dan Penjualan Berbasis Web. In Jurnal Transistor Elektro Dan Informatika (Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 81–88).

Taksonomi, P., Dan, B., Widya, S., Dharma, C., Prof, J., & No, M. Y. (2021). SISWA DI SAMARINDA UNTUK ASPEK AFEKTIF. 23(2), 189–200.

Wibow, A. S., Qodri, A. F., & Ridha, A. R. (2025). JENIS-JENIS SKALA SIKAP: PENGUKURAN OPINI DAN PERSEPSI. JIPDAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 3(3), 61–65.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01