LITERASI SAINS SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR MELALUI PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM (DEEP LEARNING)

Authors

  • Dzuhrotul Ulumiyah Universitas Prof Dr Hafiz MPH
  • Maya Adina Pratama Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i04.35774

Keywords:

science literacy, deep learning, elementary school

Abstract

This study was conducted based on the low level of science literacy among elementary school students, which is mainly caused by learning activities that emphasize memorization rather than critical thinking and meaningful understanding of scientific concepts. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of the deep learning approach to improve science literacy among elementary school students. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving one teacher and 20 fifth-grade students from a public elementary school in Kutai Barat Regency. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation, then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the deep learning approach improves students’ science literacy in three main aspects: conceptual understanding, scientific process skills, and scientific attitudes. Students became more active, reflective, and able to relate scientific concepts to real-life situations. In addition, this approach fostered curiosity, collaboration, and deeper engagement in learning. Therefore, the deep learning approach is considered effective in developing meaningful and contextual science learning, which supports the enhancement of science literacy competencies in line with 21st-century learning goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, Lisa Carney, and Fernandez-Branson. 2024. “Alignment of Learning Objectives, Assessments, and Active Learning to Promote Critical Thinking in a First-Year Medical Physiology Course: Lessons Learned.” Advances in Physiology Education 48(2):385–94. doi:10.1152/advan.00096.2023.

Fuadi Husnul. Robbia Annisa Zikri , Jamaluddin, Jufri Abdul Wahab. 2020. “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan 5(2).

Istyadji, Maya, and Sauqina. 2023. “Conception of Scientific Literacy in the Development of Scientific Literacy Assessment Tools: A Systematic Theoretical Review.” Journal of Turkish Science Education 20(2):281–308. doi:10.36681/tused.2023.016.

Jiang, Shan. 2022. “The Practice And Application Of Deep Learning Theory In Preschool Education Curriculum Reform From The Perspective Of Educational Psychology.” Psychiatria Danubina 34:713–715.

Kong, Cuiwei, And Weiren Hao. 2022. “Research On The Teaching Reform Of Preschool Education Specialty Based On The Deep Learning Theory From The Perspective Of Educational Psychology.” Psychiatria Danubina 636–637.

Lopes, Renato Matos, Michele Waltz Comarú, Max Fonseca Pierini, Raphael Argento de Souza, and Rachel Ann Hauser-Davis. 2024. “Scientific Communication and Scientific Literacy for the Public Perception of the Importance of Environmental Quality for Public Health.” Frontiers in Communication 9. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1297246.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., and J. Saldaña. 2014. “Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd Ed.).” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Mr., Sueb, Lina Purwaning Hartanti, and Layli Hidayah. 2018. “21st Century Skills: Literacy-Based Learning in Academic Debate Classes for University Students.” 222(SoSHEC):10–14. doi:10.2991/soshec-18.2018.3.

Nabila, Siti Maulidiya, and Melinda Septiani. 2025. “Pendekatan Deep Learning Untuk Pembelajaran IPA Yang Bermakna Di Sekolah Dasar.” 2(1):9–20.

OECD 2023. 2022. “PISA PISA 2022 Results Malaysia.” Journal Pendidikan 10. https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/malaysia-1dbe2061/.

OECED. 2018. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework.

Piaget, J. 1972. The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books.

Salong, Amjad, and Paisal Ansiska. 2025. “Integrating Mindful , Meaningful , and Joyful Learning to Enhance Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Economic Education.” 17:4543–57. doi:10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7484.

Sumanti, S., and D. Aulia. 2018. “International Journal of Education and Management.” CRC Publications.

Ulumiyah, Dzuhrotul. 2025. “Analysis Of Elementary School Students ’ Scientific Literacy Through A Guided Inquiry Approach.” 5(1):116–22.

Ulumiyah, Dzuhrotul, Mohammad Syarif Sumantri, Yuli Rahmawati, and Vina Iasha. 2022. “An Analysis of Science Literacy Ability Elementary School Students.” Jurnal Basicedu 6(3):3544–53. doi:10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2623.

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Xiaoling, Wan Marzuki Wan Jaafar, and Rose Manisah Sulong. 2025. “Building Better Learners: Exploring Positive Emotions and Life Satisfaction as Keys to Academic Engagement.” Frontiers in Education 10(March). doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1535996.

Widodo, S. T., A. F. Nisa, M. I. Ardi, A. I. N. Huda, and D. Cahyaningtyas. 2025. “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Melalui Pendekatan Deep Learning Di SD.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar Berbasis Deep Learning 3:375–93.

Yusmar, Firdha, and Rizka Elan Fadilah. 2023. “Analisis Rendahnya Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Indonesia: Hasil Pisa Dan Faktor Penyebab.” LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA 13(1):11–19. doi:10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-19