INTEGRITAS KEILMUAN DAN IMPLIKASI ETIS PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DALAM PENELITIAN: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i4.35528Keywords:
artificial intelligence, academic ethics, integrityAbstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) in the scientific research ecosystem has accelerated significantly and offers efficiency at various stages of research, from data processing, analysis, to manuscript preparation. However, the use of AI raises new ethical challenges that have not been fully accommodated in conventional scientific integrity guidelines. This study is a Systematic Literature Review that aims to map research trends, integrity and ethical implications of the use of AI, as well as ethical challenges in the use of AI in scientific research and publications. The study was conducted on 25 scientific articles. The results of the study show an increasing trend, especially in 2019-2023. The use of AI is inseparable from ethical responsibility, academic transparency, and compliance with scientific publication guidelines. The challenges in the application of AI ethics are multidimensional, ranging from AI bias and ethical norms in scientific research, violations of AI in research, confidentiality and privacy, and morality in the use of AI. Therefore, an approach that combines normative ethical frameworks, technical operational standards, and adaptive and sustainable institutional governance is needed.
Downloads
References
Academies, A. E. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Revised Edition 2023. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
Allea. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECOC
Bell, N., & Ã, N. B. (2008). Children ’ s Geographies Ethics in child research : rights , reason and responsibilities Ethics in child research : rights , reason and responsibilities. Children’s Geographies, 6(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280701791827
Bender, E. M., & Mcmillan-major, A. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots : Can Language Models Be Too Big ? FAccT, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Butterwick, S., Head, G., Madalinska-michalak, J., Taylor, A., & Taylor-neu, R. (2020). Introduction : Ethical issues in educational research. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119896506
Cheong, B. C. (2024). Transparency and accountability in AI systems : safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Frontiers, 6, 1–11.
Clark, T. A. (2025). Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Scholarly Writing. Journal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing, 14(3), 85–91.
Dean, J. E., Bates, A. J., & Fowler, S. G. (2025). Using generative AI responsibly in writing and publishing : the NZVJ ’ s policy and recommendations. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 0(0), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2025.2576465
Dobrick, F. M., & Fischer, J. (2018). Research Ethics in the Digital Age. Springer.
Eliot, L. (2023). Generative AI ChatGPT Can Disturbingly Gobble Up Your Private And Confidential Data, Forewarns AI Ethics And AI Law. Generative AI ChatGPT Can Disturbingly Gobble Up Your Private And Confidential Data, Forewarns AI Ethics And AI Law
Fjeld, J. (2020). Principled Artificial Intelligence : Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights- Based Approaches to Principles for AI Research Publication No . 2020-1 Principled Artificial Intelligence : Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principle (Issue January). Berkman Klein Center. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3518482
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Uni ed Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), 1–14.
Ganjavi, C., Eppler, M. B., Pekcan, A., Biedermann, B., Abreu, A., Collins, G. S., Gill, I. S., & Cacciamani, G. E. (2024). Publishers ’ and journals ’ instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing : bibliometric analysis. BMJ, 384, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077192
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The Ethics of AI Ethics : An Evaluation of Guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Head, G. (2018). Ethics in educational research : Review boards , ethical issues and researcher development . European Educational Research, August. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315
Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449
Jenkins, R., & Lin, P. (2023). AI-Assisted Authorship: How to Assign Credit in Synthetic Scholarship. SSRN Electronic Journal, January, 0–13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4342909
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2021). education sciences Gamification in Science Education . A Systematic Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–36.
Leonard, J., Mitchell, M., & ... (2018). Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through robotics, game design, and culturally responsive teaching. … Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317
Lin, Z. (2024). Towards an AI policy framework in scholarly publishing. Trends Cogn Sci, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.12.002
Mittelstadt, B. (2020). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(1), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
OECD. (2019). AI principles. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ai-principles.html
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Jan, C. Y., Hutchinson, B., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI Accountability Gap : Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20), 1–12.
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025). The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool. AI and Ethics, 5(2), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8
Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2022). Responsible Conduct of Research 4th Edition. Oxford University Press.
Syahriani, N., Winarti, & Siagian, G. S. (2025). RTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) DALAM KEPENULISAN ILMIAH: MANFAAT DAN TANTANGAN PENGGUNAAN TOOLS PARAFRASE. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(3), 295–317.
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879
UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers (Issue September). https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Ungerer, L., & Slade, S. (2022). Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics in Distance Education Contexts. Springer.
Vaccaro, M., Almaatouq, A., & Malone, T. (2024). When combinations of humans and AI are useful : A systematic review and. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(December), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1
Vecchione, B., & Vaughan, J. W. (2021). Datasheets for Datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
