PENGARUH AI (CHAT GPT) GENERATIF TERHADAP ETIKA DAN MINAT BELAJAR SISWA SMA KOTA PADANG

Authors

  • Ririn Amaliah Putri Sarah Institut Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang
  • Merdila Nuril Fahmi Institusi Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang
  • Fadli Ilham Institusi Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang
  • Nurkemala Sari Institusi Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.32777

Keywords:

generative AI, ChatGPT, academic ethics, learning interest, high school students

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of generative AI such as ChatGPT on academic ethics and learning interest among high school students in Padang City. The use of AI in education is increasing, but there are concerns about its impact on academic integrity and student motivation. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method involving 150 students from five high schools in Padang City. The results show that ChatGPT usage is high with a score of 4.12, learning interest is also high with a score of 4.01, but academic ethics is only moderate with a score of 3.45. This indicates that while ChatGPT aids in understanding course material, it also poses challenges in maintaining academic integrity. This study offers an ethical framework for the use of AI in school environments to optimize benefits and minimize negative impacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. (2021). Pemanfaatan AI Generatif dalam Dunia Pendidikan: Peluang dan Tantangan. Jurnal Pendidikan Digital, 12(3), 101–115.

Ali, H., & Wahyuni, D. (2023). Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa: Studi Literatur. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 14(2), 150–163.

Arikunto, S. (2021). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Azizah, R. et al. (2022). Minat Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Daring Berbasis AI. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi, 10(1), 55–70.

Budiarto, T. (2023). Analisis Etika Akademik pada Penggunaan ChatGPT di Kalangan Pelajar. Jurnal Etika dan Teknologi, 8(2), 89–102.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darmawan, Y. (2022). Digital Ethics in High School: AI Application Perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 11(1), 22–35.

Effendi, M. (2019). Tantangan Penggunaan AI dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 110–123.

Gunawan, S. et al. (2023). Persepsi Guru terhadap Penggunaan AI Generatif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi, 13(3), 175–189.

Hidayat, A. (2021). Literasi Digital Siswa dan Penggunaan AI. Jurnal Komunikasi Pendidikan, 9(2), 60–74.

Indrawati, N. (2024). Implementasi ChatGPT dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 16(1), 91–103.

Jannah, M. (2022). Hubungan antara Literasi Digital dan Etika Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 20(2), 119–131.

Johnson, A., & Lee, M. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in K-12 Classrooms: Promise and Peril. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 98–110.

Kurniawan, D. (2020). ChatGPT dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Alternatif, 6(3), 147–160.

Lestari, P., & Ramadhani, I. (2021). Etika Digital untuk Remaja di Era AI. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Digital, 12(1), 45–59.

Maulana, R. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi AI pada Pendidikan Menengah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Pendidikan, 7(4), 212–226.

Prasetya, A., & Wulandari, E. (2023). Pengaruh AI dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 11(1), 44–59.

Putra, Y. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis AI: Studi Kasus di SMA Kota Besar. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional, 14(1), 33–47.

Rahmawati, D. (2021). Etika Akademik di Era Digital. Jurnal Kependidikan, 17(2), 99–112.

Santos, R., Kim, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2021). ChatGPT in Education: Benefits and Ethical Concerns. AI & Learning, 9(4), 77–89.

Siregar, M. (2024). Persepsi Siswa terhadap AI dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Inovasi Digital, 15(2), 66–79.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-02

Most read articles by the same author(s)