PENGARUH MODEL KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN DISPOSISI MATEMATIS TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN METAKOGNITIF SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA SISWA KELAS IV SD (MATERI OPERASI HITUNG BILANGAN CACAH) Nofrizal1, Nama_2 (Redo Andi Marta2),Y
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.24503Keywords:
think pair share, mathematical disposition, metacognitive skills, mathematics problem solving, elementary schoolAbstract
This study aims to examine the effect of Think Pair Share (TPS) type cooperative learning model and mathematical disposition on students' metacognitive skills in solving mathematical problems on the material of counting operations of small numbers. Using a 2x2 factorial experimental design, this study involved 48 fourth grade elementary school students in Padang City. The results of the two-way analysis of variance showed: (1) there was a significant difference in metacognitive skills between students taught using TPS and expository models (F(1, 44) = 25.432, *p* < 0.001, η² = 0.366); (2) there was no significant interaction between learning model and mathematical disposition (F(1, 44) = 0.021, *p* = 0. 886); (3) in the high mathematical disposition group, students taught with the TPS model showed better metacognitive skills compared to the expository model (*t*(22) = 7.12, *p* < 0.001, *d* = 2. 93); (4) in the low mathematical disposition group, students taught with the TPS model also showed better metacognitive skills compared to the expository model (*t*(22) = 4.23, *p* < 0.001, *d* = 1.66). These findings indicate that the TPS learning model is effective in improving students' metacognitive skills, both for students with high and low mathematical disposition.Downloads
References
Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., & Wardani, O. P. (2013). Model dan metode pembelajaran di sekolah. Semarang: Unissula Press.
Azizah, N. (2018). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share untuk aktivitas siswa dan hasil belajar matematika anak tunarungu. Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Biasa, 4(1).
Budiharti, R. (2016). Efektivitas model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe The Power of Two dalam pembelajaran fisika. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 6(1).
Chimuma, & Johnson, D. L. (2016). Assessing students’ use of metacognition during mathematical problem solving using smartpens. Educational Research: Theory & Practice, 28(1).
Chiu, M. M., & Kuo, S. W. (2020). From metacognition to social metacognition: Similarities, differences, and learning. Journal of Education Psychology, 112(3), 578-595.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2017. Research methods in education. 8th ed. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D., 2018. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Daniels, H., 2001. Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E. & Gardner, M., 2017. Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2018). Pendekatan keterampilan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematika. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1).
Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene's test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Statistical Science, 24(3), 343-360. 92
Hattie, J., 2009. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Huda, M. (2015). Cooperative learning: Metode, teknik, struktur dan model penerapan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Isjoni. (2009). Cooperative learning (Efektivitas pembelajaran kelompok). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E., 2015. Models of teaching. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Junaidi. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika siswa dengan menggunakan Greded Response Models di SMA Negeri 1 Sakti. Numeracy Journal, 4.
Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think Pair Share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students' critical thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4).
Kagan, S. & Kagan, M., 2009. Kagan cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.M., Johnson, M. and Kangasniemi, M., 2016. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing, 72(12), pp.2954-2965.
Kartikasari, D. (2022). Mengoptimalkan kemampuan berpikir analisis konsep tekanan pada zat padat melalui model siklus belajar dengan pendekatan metakognitif. Action: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Tindakan Kelas dan Sekolah, 2(2).
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. eds., 2001. Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310.
Marlina, H., & Ikhsan. (2014). Penggunaan model kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan disposisi matematis di SMA Negeri 1 Bireuen. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(2).
Marzano, R.J., 2017. The new art and science of teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Melisa. (2020). Siapa bilang mengajar matematika sulit. Jakarta: Guepedia.
Mohamad, S. (2015). Strategi Pembelajaran (Teori dan Praktik di Tingkat Pendidikan Dasar). PT Raja Grafindo. 93
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2000. Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Pradana, O. R. Y. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share (TPS) Pada Prestasi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 1(1).
Pratiwi, I. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Metakognisi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Melalui Think Pair Share pada siswa kelas X3 SMA N Yosowilangun Lumajang Tahun 2014/2015. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ, 3(2).
Qodariyah, L., & Hendriana, H. (2015). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Disposisi Matematik Siswa SMP Melalui Discovery Learning. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(3).
Rohmah, S. N. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. UAD Press.
Safira, A. R., & Ifadah, A. S. (2020). Pembelajaran sains dan matematika anak usia dini. Jawa Timur: Caremedia Communication.
Safitri, K. R. (2015). Analisis pemecahan masalah matematika menggunakan metakognisi. Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UIN Walisongo Semarang, hlm. 470.
Sari, I. P., & Sari, A. (2019). The effect of Think Pair Share learning model on students' mathematical problem solving ability and self-confidence. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 042070.
Setiawan, D. B., & Susanah. (2023). Penerapan Goal Free Problems dalam pembelajaran matematika secara kolaboratif untuk melatih kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah. Jurnal Mathedunesa, 12(1).
Setiawan, Y., & Cahyaningsih, U. (2023). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Think Pair And Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Polinomial Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).
Slavin, R.E., 2018. Educational psychology: Theory and practice. 12th ed. New York: Pearson.
Zamzuri, A. R., Hasniati, D. F., & Tri, A. D. D. W. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Interaksi Teman Sebaya terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPAS Kelas 8 di MTsN 2 Lamongan. Jurnal NSER, 197–206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
