ANALISIS KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS XI DI MA MUHAMMADIYAH ERENG-ERENG

Authors

  • Hardianti Universitas Muhammadiyah Ereng-ereng
  • Eka Prabawati Rum Universitas Muhammadiyah Ereng-ereng
  • Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Ereng-ereng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i3.18368

Keywords:

Interpersonal Communication, Non Verbal Communication, Facial Expression

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the role of non verbal communication at second grade in MA Muhammadiyah Ereng-Ereng in building interpersonal communication. Employing a qualitative descriptive method with observation checklists and interviews, the study identified five types of non-verbal communication: facial expression, posture, gesture, eye movement, and eye contact. Data analysis using Nvivo 12 revealed that facial expression is the most dominant form of non-verbal communication, scoring 8 out of 8, followed by posture (6/8), gesture (5/8), eye contact (4/8), and eye movements (1/8). The interviews indicated that although students were not initially aware of the theoretical definition of non-verbal communication, they recognized its practical use after an explanation. Facial expressions such as serious, smiling, and confused were commonly observed, reflecting the students' engagement and comprehension. Postures like sitting upright indicated interest, while leaning back with crossed arms signaled boredom. Gestures, particularly hand and head movements, boosted students' confidence in communication. Eye movements and eye contact facilitated attention and interaction, although students sometimes lost focus or used glances to communicate boredom.The study concludes that non-verbal communication significantly enhances the learning environment and interpersonal relationships among students. Understanding and effectively utilizing these non-verbal cues can lead to a more dynamic and supportive classroom experience. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating non-verbal communication awareness into teaching strategies to encourage better student engagement and interaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gantiano, H. E. (2020). Analisis Dampak Strategi Komunikasi Non Verbal. Dharma Duta, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.33363/dd.v17i2.392

Gomes, S., Costa, L., Martinho, C., Dias, J., Xexéo, G., & Moura Santos, A. (2023). Modeling students’ behavioral engagement through different in-class behavior styles. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00407-w

Ibrahim, N. A. N., Abdul Rani, N. S., Jamri, M. H., Bakar, M. H., Abdul Wahab, S., Mahbob, M. H., & Kahar, N. (2022). The Importance of Non-Verbal Communication in Organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i6/13901

Okon, J. J. (2011). Role of Non-Verbal Communication In Education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(5), 35–40.

Prasanna, S. A. S., Abeysena, H. T. C. S., & Alagiyawanna, M. A. A. P. (2023). Development and validation of the interpersonal communication assessment tool for assessing the interpersonal communication skills of public health midwives. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09511-7

Ronsani Thamrin, N., & Darsih, E. (2023). An Analysis of Non-Verbal Communication in Students’ Speaking Performance. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12979

Sugiyono. (2016). METLIT SUGIYONO.pdf (p. 336).

Yulikhah, S., Bukhori, B., & Murtadho, A. (2019). Self concept, self efficacy, and interpersonal communication effectiveness of student. Psikohumaniora, 4(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v4i1.3196

Zadeh, S. (n.d.). Hand Gestures in Communication: Benefits for the Speaker and the Audience. Retrieved from https://sophiezadeh.com/body-language/hand-gestures-in-communication-benefits/

Downloads

Published

2024-09-12