META EVALUASI: PROGRAM GURU PENGGERAK DI PENDIDIKAN DASAR

Authors

  • Rahmi Hayati Universitas Almuslim
  • Fachrurazi PGSD FKIP Universitas Almuslim
  • Asrul Karim PGSD FKIP Universitas Almuslim
  • Abdurahman Adisaputera Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Adi Sutopo Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Abdul Murad Bimbingan Dan Konseling Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v8i3.11434

Keywords:

Meta Evaluation, Teacher Mobilization Program

Abstract

Meta Evaluation of Teacher Mobilization programs usually focuses on assessing the overall impact of the program. This meta-evaluation covers aspects such as the program's effectiveness in achieving its initial objectives, efficient use of resources, relevance to the needs of teachers and students, as well as its long-term impact on teacher learning and development. Some evaluation points that may be included in a Meta Evaluation of a Teacher Mobilization program: Achievement of Goals: Measure the extent to which the Teacher Mobilization program has achieved its initial goals of improving teaching quality, teacher engagement, or student achievement. Resource Utilization: Evaluation of the efficient use of resources, such as time, money, and labor, to ensure that programs are implemented optimally. Teacher Engagement: Assess the extent to which the program has succeeded in actively and sustainably engaging teachers in their professional development. Changes in Teaching Practices: Seeing concrete changes in teaching methods, strategies, or approaches implemented by teachers as a result of the Teacher Mobilization program. Impact on Students: Evaluate how the program impacts student achievement, their motivation to learn, and improvements in academic or non-academic outcomes. Meta Evaluations like this are important to understand not only whether the Teacher Mobilization program is working, but also how it is impacting the education system as a whole. This provides necessary insight for future improvements, changes, or expansion of the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Damayanti, D., Asbari, M., & Zaharantika, A. (2023). Guru Penggerak : Pengembangan Pendidikan melalui Kepemimpinan Guru. Journal of Information Systems and Management, 03(02), 5–10.

Hayati, R., Armanto, D., & Zuraini, Z. (2023). UPAYA MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH SISWA MELALUI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN MULTIMEDIA INTERAKTIF. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6534

Hayati, R., Marzuki, M., Fachrurazi, F., Karim, A., Dewi, R., & Habsari, S. P. (2023). Penerapan filsafat pendidikan oleh tenaga pendidik di sekolah dasar. 10(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37598/pjpp.v10i1,%20April.1702

Jannati, P., Ramadhan, F. A., & Rohimawan, M. A. (2023). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Dasar. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 330. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i1.1714

Lubis, R. R., Amelia, F., Alvionita, E., Nasution, I. E., & Lubis, Y. H. (2023). Peran Guru Penggerak dalam Meningkatkan Pemerataan Kualitas Kinerja Guru. Jurnal At-Tadbir : Media Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 33(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.52030/attadbir.v33i1.170

Marisana, D., Iskandar, S., & Kurniawan, D. T. (2023). Penggunaan Platform Merdeka Mengajar untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i1.4363

Mubarokah, L., Azizah, U. N., Riyanti, A., Nugroho, B. N., & Sandy, T. A. (2021). Pentingnya Inovasi Pendidik untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan. JIRA: Jurnal Inovasi Dan Riset Akademik, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.47387/jira.v2i9.224

Novita, E. (2022). Praktik Pembelajaran Inovatif Guru Penggerak di SDN Inpres Tenga. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 2(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v2i2.225

Patilima, S. (2022). Sekolah Penggerak Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 0(0), 228–236. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1069

Sijabat, O. P., Manao, M. M., Situmorang, A. R., Hutauruk, A., & Panjaitan, S. (2022). Mengatur Kualitas Guru Melalui Program Guru Penggerak. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation (ELIa), 2(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.46229/elia.v2i1.404

Syarifuddin, S., & Adiansha, A. A. (2023). Pendampingan Guru melalui Pendampingan Individu dan Lokakarya Pendidikan Guru Penggerak Angkatan 4 Kabupaten Bima dalam rangka Pengembangan dan Pengimbasan Budaya Positif Pembelajaran. Bima Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.53299/bajpm.v3i1.280

Tangahu, W. (2021). Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar Guru Sebagai Penggerak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 2(1), 353–359. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/PSNPD/article/view/1081

Umboh, P. C., Lengkong, J. F., & Plangiten, N. N. (2023). Efektivitas Program Guru Penggerak Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset Dan Teknologidi Smp Negeri 3 Tumpaan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, IX(2), 117–131.

Wijaya, S., & Marini, A. (2022). Pengunaan Aplikasi Merdeka Mengajar Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Sekolah Penggerak. Pendas : Jurnal

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15