SPIRIT PENGEMBANGAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN DI PERGURUAN TINGGI

Authors

  • Heri Erlangga universitas pasundan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v1i2.1304

Keywords:

Spirit Entrepreneurship in Higher Institutions

Abstract

ASBTRACT The selection of this title was based on the anxiety towards entrepreneurship education phenomenon in hinger institutions which has only been introduced in 1900s. The number of universities and higher institutions in big cities offering at least on class of entreprenenurship is increasing every year; however, hinger institutions are still limited to merely creating graduates as job seekers instead of graduates as job creators. Further, the lack of integration between entrepreneurship education and the structure of curriculum causes problems related to entrepreneurship mental; separated itself from the industry sector, and causes lack of orientation to business development and business opportunities. The issue raised in this research is related to the strategy and development of entrepreneurship program focusing on Philosophical Problematic; entrepreneurship meaning-building, Process Problematic: entrepreneurship development policy, Result Problematic: the impact of entrepreneurship development, Strategy Problematic: the search for model and strategy of entrepreneurship development in higher institutions. The research employed qualitative approach; the data collection was conducted through interview techniques and observation. The results of the research show that in terms of philosophical aspect: (1) the understanding towards entrepreneurship meaning is still in the area of practical approach; (2) the benefit of the entrepreneurship program could increase students confidence to be independent; (3) the entrepreneurship program is the media to provide the values of Independency and Confidence, Creative and Innovative Skill; from the Aspect of Process; (4) the entrepreneurship program can be studied from the aspect of Curriculum; (5) a special policy on entrepreneurship program has not been established; in terms of Result Aspect; (6) entrepreneurship development gives meaningful impact on changing ways of thinking and work governance; in terms of Aspect of Strategy; (7) entrepreneurship strategy and development in higher institutions have not yet been established. The conclusions are: (1) there is a narrow meaning-building towards entrepreneurship, a view saying that entrepreneurship is identical with what an entrepreneur or a businessman with a corporate has; (2) entrepreneurship development program is conducted through, one of them, the implementation of entrepreneurship course subject into the curriculum structure which strenghthens the “soul” of entrepreneurship; (3) the implementation and administration of entrepreneurship program still face challenges, in part because of people’s incorrect view on university entrepreneurship; (4) entrepreneurship strategy and development requires Business Incubator Model (INBIS), functioning on incubating business potency, which in turn could create Technopreneurship (modern knowledge and technology based entrepreneurship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Alen, Mark. (2002). The Corporate University.New York. Amacom.

Alma, B. (2009). Kewirausahaan. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Alma, B dan Hurriyati, Ratih. (2008). Manajemen Corporate dan Strategi Pemasaran Jasa Pendidikan. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Antonio, S. (2007). Muhammad SAW, The Super Leader Super Manager. Jakarta. PLM.

Clegg, Brian dan Birch, Paul. (2001). Instant Creativity. Jakarta. Erlangga.

Crombie, Roger. W. (2005). Curriculum Innovation. Jakarta. Grasindo

Daniels, Aubrey. C. (2005). Maximum Performance. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Drucker, Peter F. (1996). Inovasi dan Kewiraswastaan. Jakarta. Erlangga.

Drucker, Foundation. (2001). The Organization of The Future: Organisasi Masa Depan. Alih Bahasa oleh Ahmad Kemal. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Gasset, J. Ortega Y.(1966). Mission of the University. New York: Norton Co.

Glaser, Barney, dan Anselm L. Strauss. (1974). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. Chicago

Green, Andy. (2001). Kreativitas dan Public Relation. Jakarta. Erlangga.

Hisrich, Robert. D, Peter, Michael. P, Shepherd, Dean. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship. New York. Mc. Graw Hill.

Ihalauw, John. J.O.I. (2008). Konstruksi Teori: Komponen dan Proses. Jakarta. Grasindo.

Kao, Raymond. W.Y. (1997). An Entrepreneurial Approach to Corporate Management. Singapura. Prentice Hall.

Kaplan, D. dan Manners A.Robert. (2002). Teori Budaya. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Kiyosaki, Robert T. (2003). The Business School. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Kotter, John P.dan James L. Heskett. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press.

Margianti. (2008). Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi di Era Global. Jakarta. Gunadarma.

Maxwell, Joseph A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design An Interactive Approach. London: SAGE. Thousand Oaks.

McMillan, Schumacher. (2000). Research in Education (fifth edition). New York. Longman.

Meister, Jeanne. C. (1994). Corporate Quality Universities. New York. Irwin.

Meredith G. (2002). Kewirausahaan: Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta. PPM.

Muhadjir, N.(1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Moleong, L.J.(1989). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Karya

Nasution, A.H., Noer, B.A. dan Suef, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship; Membangun Spirit Teknopreneurship. Yogyakarta. ANDI.

Osborne, David, dan Ted Gaebler. (1992). Reinventing Government (How The Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Inc.

Pandji A dan Djoko S. (2002). Koperasi, Kewirausahaan, dan Usaha Kecil. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta.

Reksohadiprodjo, S dan Handoko, Hani. (2001). Organisasi Perusahaan. Yogyakarta. BPFE.

Rangkuti, F. (1999). Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Roger, Everett dan Shoemaker, Floyd.F (1987). Communication of Innovations. Alih Bahasa oleh Abdillah Hanafi. Surabaya. Usaha Nasional.

Sathe, Vijay. (1985). Culture and Related Corporate Realities. Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Homewood, III.

Slamet, M. (2004). Prosiding Lokakarya : Merekayasa Jalan Menuju Transformasi Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta. Forum HEDS.

Steiner, George A. (1992). Strategic Planning. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. United State of America.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Suryana. (2003). Kewirausahaan : Pedoman Praktis, Kiat dan Proses Menuju Sukses. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.

Targowski, Andrew. S. dan Tarn, Michael. J. (2007). Enterprise Systems Education in the 21st Century. USA. INFOSCI.

Tilaar, H.A.R., dan Nugroho, R. (2008). Kebijakan Pendidikan. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

White, Crombie. (2005). Curriculum Innovation. Alih Bahasa oleh Aprilia B. Hendrijani. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Watson. H.Gregory. (1997). Strategic Benchmarking “Mengukur Kinerja Perusahaan Anda Dibandingkan Perusahaan-perusahaan Terbaik Dunia”. Alih Bahasa oleh Robert Haryono Imam. Jakarta. Gremedia.

Zohar, Danah. Dan Marshal, Ian. (2005). Spiritual Capital; Memberdayakan SQ di Dunia Bisnis. Alih Bahasa oleh Helmi Mustofa. Bandung. Mizan.

Jurnal Ilmiah :

Journal of Private Enterprise. Vol. IX, No. 2 :71. “A Typology of Entrepreneurial Styles: Beyond Economic Rationality”.

Sumber Lain :

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional. Jakarta. Depdiknas.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 09 Tahun 2009. Tentang Badan Hukum Pendidikan. Jakarta. Depdiknas.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 1999. Tentang Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta.

Instruksi Presiden Nomor 04 Tahun 1995. Tentang Gerakan Nasional Memasyarakatkan dan Membudayakan Kewirausahaan. Jakarta.

Depdiknas Dirjen Dikti. (2004). Strategi Jangka Panjang Pendidikan Tinggi 2003-2010 (HELTS); Mewujudkan Perguruan Tinggi Berkualitas. Jakarta. Depdiknas RI.

Depdiknas. (2006). Pedoman Operasional Pengembangan Model Inkubator Bisnis Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta. Depdiknas RI.

Direktorat Kelembagaan. Dirjen Dikti. (2008). Panduan Program Mahasiswa Wirausaha (PMW). Jakarta. Depdiknas Republik Indonesia.

Badan Akreditasi Nasional. (2008). Standar Penilaian Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta. BAN-Pusat.

Ahmad, Anizir. (2001). Model Kurikulum dan Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewiraswastaan. Hasil Penelitian. UPI Bandung.

Akbar, Sa’adun. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip dan Vektor-vektor Percepatan Proses Internalisasi Nilai Kewirausahaan. Hasil Penelitian. UPI Bandung.

Bunyamin, Ichlas. (2002). Model Pelatihan Perintisan / Pengembangan Wirausaha. Hasil Penelitian. UPI Bandung.

Ciputra. (2009). Tularkan Entrepreneurship. Radar Banten (22 April 2009).

Dirjen Dikti (2008). Data Sarjana Nganggur. Kompas (6 Februari 2008).

Evans. (2002). Menggagas Rencana Bisnis Strategis. Hasil Penelitian. UPI Bandung.

Litbang Diknas. (2005). Permasalahan Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia ”The Burning Issues”. Hasil Penelitian. Depdikbud. Jakarta.

Suhendraya, Hendi M. (2002). Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Kewiraswastaan dalam Muatan Lokal. Hasil Penelitian. UPI Bandung.

Wijiyanto. (2009). Merajut Kembali Entrepreneur University. Kolom Academia dari Untirta untuk Banten. Radar Banten (23 Februari 2009).

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27