Reviewer and Review Process

Review Process

Every manuscript is single blind reviewed by at least 2 reviewer and takes about 1-2 month. Turnitin will be used for similarity check. The maximum score of similarity check result is 25%.

Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Review Process

1. Prohibition of AI Use in Peer Review

Reviewers are strictly prohibited from using artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including generative AI systems and AI-powered applications, to conduct, support, or prepare any part of the manuscript review process. This prohibition applies to, but is not limited to, uploading or sharing submitted manuscripts, in whole or in part, with AI tools; generating or revising review comments; evaluating the scientific quality, originality, methodology, results, or conclusions of a manuscript; and formulating recommendations regarding acceptance, revision, or rejection.

2. Confidentiality and Data Protection

Submitted manuscripts and all associated review materials are confidential. Reviewers must not disclose, upload, or otherwise transfer manuscript content, unpublished findings, author information, or editorial correspondence to any AI system or third-party platform.

3. Independent Professional Judgment

Reviewers are required to conduct their evaluations independently, based on their own expertise, critical analysis, and professional judgment. All comments, criticisms, recommendations, and editorial advice submitted to the journal must be the reviewers' own work.

4. Compliance and Accountability

By accepting a review assignment, reviewers acknowledge and agree to comply with this policy. Any suspected violation may be reported to the Editor-in-Chief and may result in the termination of the review assignment, removal from the journal's reviewer database, or other appropriate action in accordance with the journal's publication ethics policies.

5. Declaration of Compliance

Reviewers may be required to confirm that they have not used AI tools in preparing their review reports. The journal reserves the right to request clarification if concerns arise regarding compliance with this policy.

Reviewers:

1. Prof. Herto Dwi Ariesyady (Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia) (Google Scholar) (Scopus) (Sinta)

2. Prof. Dr. Lily Surayya Eka Putri (Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus)

3. Dr. Ir. Anik Sarminingsih, M.T., IPM., ASEAN Eng. (Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia) (Google Scholar) (Scopus) (Sinta)

4. Gatut Sudarjanto, Ph.D (Department of Environment, Science and Innovation, Queensland Government, Australia) (Scopus)

5. Dr. Indriyani Rachman (The University of Kitakyushu, Japan) (Scopus)

6. Dr. Fadjari Lucia Nugroho (Universitas Pasundan, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID : 5983690)

7. Rofiq Iqbal, ST, MEng, PhD (Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID : 5974491)

8. Prof. Dr. Astri Rinanti, Dra, MT (Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID : 6091465)

9. Prof. Dr.Eng. Denny Helard, ST, MT (Universitas Andalas, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID : 259374)

10. Dr. Moh. Rangga Sururi (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID: 6186824)

11. Dr. Evi Afiatun (Universitas Pasundan, Indonesia) (Google Scholar, Scopus, SINTA ID : 5981878)

Surat Keputusan Mitra Bestari JCBEEM (2024-2025) (Indonesian)

Surat Keputusan Mitra Bestari JCBEEM (2023-2024) (Indonesian)

Surat Keputusan Mitra Bestari JCBEEM (2021-2022) (Indonesian)

Surat Keputusan Mitra Bestari JCBEEM (2018-2020) (Indonesian)