THE INCREASING MODEL OF FAMILY’S SOCIAL SUPPORT AND CHILD WITH DISABILITY’S ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v3i2.427Keywords:
Social Support, Family and Environment, Children with DisabilitiesAbstract
Social support from family and the environment is one of the important variables that can support the development of children with disabilities. The purposes of the research are to know, understand and analyze; (1) social support received by children with disabilities from the family and the child's environment before the implamentation of the model; (2) design and implementation of the family and environmental social support development model; (3) social support received by child with disabity from the family and the environment of the child after the implementation of the model. This action research has involved 21 informants, consists of eight mothers, three fathers, eight children, one aunt and one grandmother. Data collection techniques are through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participatory observation and documentation study. The research results show that social support before the implementation of model from family and the environment already exists but is still very minimum. After implementation of the model, social support from the family increased in all aspects of social support, they are: in the aspects of instrumental support, informational support, emotional support, self-esteem support, and support from the surrounding environment. The process of action research involved the active participation of informants to engage in social support development models through social work activities at micro, mezzo and macro scope. Indonesia which has a social capital in the form of a strong sense of kinship, it becomes the basis of model development. Involving the family and the environment directly in developed model, it is result more optimal social support system that can be provided to their children with disabilities.Downloads
References
Ashley D Faber and Stanley Wasserman. (2002). Social suport and social networks. Vol 8. USA: Emerald Group.
BPS. Pusdatin (2011). Kementrian sosial dalam angka. Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementrian Sosial Republik Indonesia.
Byrne, J. (2002). Disability in Indonesia : life is challenging for people with disabilities in Indonesia. Copyright 1996-2009 © Inside Indonesia.
Cutrona CE. (2000). Social support principles for strengthening families: messages from America. In Family Support: Direction From Diversity. Canavan J, Dolan P, Pinkerton J (eds). Jessica Kingsley: London;103–122.
DuBois Brenda and Miley Karla K. (2005). Social work an empowering profession. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
EveryChild. (2001). EveryChild. Learning Save and Supportive Scholls. www.learningfirst.org/sites/.../LFASafeSupportiveSchoolsReport.pdf
Fitzpatrick, R. Newman, S. et al. (1991). Social support disability and depression : a longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis. Social science and Medicine, 33, 605-611.
Greenspan, S.I. & Weider S. (1998). The Child with special needs: Intellectual and emotional growth. reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Hanvey, Louis. (2002). Children with disabilities and their families in Canada. www.nationalchildrensalliance.com/nca/pubs/2002/hanvey02
Harry Hikmat. (2010). Jumlah anak cacat di Indonesia. Antara News. http://antajawabarat.com.
Houston, S and Dolan, P. (2008). Conceptualising child and family support: the contribution of Honneth’s Critical. School of Sociology, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast. Children & Society vol. 22, (2008) pp. 458–469.
Komproe.I.H., Rijken, M., at all .(1997). Available support and received support : different effects under stressfull circumstance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship.
Kirk, S.Ashman. (1970). Educating exceptional children. New Delhi : Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.
Marchant R.(2001).Working with disabled children. In: Foley P., Roche J., Tucker S., editors. Children in Society: Contemporary Theory, Policy and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave in association with Open University Press.
Marie T. Obrien. (1993). Multiple sclerosis: the role of social support and disability. Boston: Sage.
Miles, M & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2 nd edn. USA: Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA.
O’Loughlin, M, and Steve O’Loughlin. (2008). Social Work with Children and Family. Glasgow.
Pain. (1999). Coping with a child with disabilities from the parents perspective: the function of information. Child, Care, Health and Development.UK. Blackwell Sciences Ltd. Vol 25 number 4 page 299-312.
Sarafino, Edward. P. (2001). Health psychology: New York: Bio-Psychosocial Interaction.
Sarason, Lerin dan Basham. (1983). Assesing Social Support. The Social support questinaire. Journal of Personality and Social.
Skinner, B. F. (1987). Whatever happened to psychology as the sience of behavior ?. American Psychologist, 42, 780-786.
Somantri, Sutjihati. (2007). Psikologi Anak Luar Biasa. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Suwarsih Madya, Ph.d Prof. (2009). Penelitian tindakan, teori dan praktik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Turner, Jay and Samuel Noh. (1988). Physical disability and depression : A longitudinal analysis. Jornal of Health and Social Behavior. Vol. 29. No. 1. USA. American Sociological Association.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nombor 23. Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan anak.
UN The Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and its optional protocol was adopted on 13 December 2006 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, and was opened for signature on 30 March 2007.
UN ESCAP. (2002). Consideration of a regional framework for action towards an inclusive, barrier free and right based society for persons with disabilities in Asia and the Pacific. High level intergovernmental meeting to conclude the Asia Pascific decade of disabled persons, 1993-2002. Otsu City, Shiga, Japan 25-28 October.
UNESCO. (2009). Teaching children with disabilities in inclusive settings. Bangkok.
Zastrow H. Charles and Kirst Ashman Karen K. (2004). Understanding human behavior and the social environment. USA: Thomson Learning Inc.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (sampurasunjournal@unpas.ac.id) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Withdrawal Penalty
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.
