CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRONIC LAW ENFORCEMENT IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEORY IN INDONESIA
CULTURAL DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTRONIC LAW ENFORCEMENT IN CRIMINAL ACTS OF THEORY IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v7i1.4149Keywords:
Electronic Evidence, Law Enforcement, Criminal Acts of Terrorism.Abstract
The culture of proving electronic evidence in law enforcement of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions ("UU ITE") which provides a legal basis for the legal culture of electronic and formal evidence and material. requirements for electronic evidence to be accepted in court. Electronic Evidence is Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents that meet the formal requirements and material requirements stipulated in the ITE Law. Article 5 paragraph (1) of the ITE Law stipulates that Electronic Information and/or Electronic Documents and/or their printouts are legal evidence. The implementation of the regulation of electronic evidence in law enforcement of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia is the use of evidence in the form of wiretapping and video recordings which were actually applied in the 2002 Bali Bombing Case. 1 of 2002 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism. Despite the controversy, the Public Prosecutor emphasized that the reading of the statements of witnesses from Malaysia and Singapore who were unable to attend the trial was legal because it was in accordance with the description of the evidence in the law. The same is regulated in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions. Article 5 states that electronic information and/or printed electronic information are legal evidence and have legal consequences. Of course, electronic information is declared valid if it uses an electronic system in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations.Downloads
References
Andi Hamzah, Introduction to Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1987.
Dellyana, Shant. 1988, Concept of Law Enforcement. Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1988.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia, Bandung Well, Bandung, 1997
S.R. Sianturi, "Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia and Its Application", Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1998.
Alan M. Gahtan, Electronic Evidence, Ontario, Carswell, 1999
Hadi al-Madkhaly, Terrorism in Islamic Review, Maktabah Salafy Press, Tegal, 2002.
Hermawan Sulistyo, Beyond Terorism, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 2002.
Muladi, Democracy of Human Rights and Legal Reform in Indonesia, Habibie Center, Jakarta, 2002.
Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police
Law number 15 of 2003 concerning eradicating acts of terrorism
Richard Totty and Anthony Hardcastle, Computer Related Crime, George Washington University Law School, Vol. 78, No. 4, November 2003.
Abdul Wahid, Terrorism Crimes, PT. Retika Aditama, Bandung, 2004.
Edmon Makarim, Introduction to Telematics Law: A Compilation of Studies, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2005.
T. Nasrullah, At a glance, Juridical Review of Both the Material and Formal Legal Aspects of Law No. 15/2003 Concerning Eradication of Terrorism, Paper At the Seminar and Workshop on "State Security" organized by the Indonesian Police Watch in Jakarta Metropolitan Police, Tuesday, March 29, 2008.
Law Number 11 Year 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions
Romli Atmasasmita, Contemporary Criminal Justice System, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2010.
Trisno Raharjo, Criminal Mediation in the Criminal Justice System: A Comparative Study and Its Application in Indonesia, Litera Book, Jogjakarta, 2011
Hendy Sumadi, Obstacles In Overcoming Criminal Actions Electronic Transaction Fraud In Indonesia, Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, Vol. 33, No. 2, September 2015.
Mamay Komariah, The Study of Terrorism Crimes from a Legal Perspective International Criminal, Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi , Vol 5, No 1 (2017)
Insan Pribadi, Legality of Electronic Evidence In the Criminal Justice System, Jurnal Renaissance No. 1 Vol. 3 januari 2018: 109-124
I Made Wirawan, Oheo K. Haris, Handrawan, Legality of the Use of Electronic Evidence in the Enforcement of Indonesian Criminal Law, Halu Oleo Legal Research Volume 2 Issue 1, April 2020
Melani, Hari Sutra Disemadi, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Criminal Law Policy in the Field of Electronic Transactions as a Non-Conventional Crime, Volume 15. Nomor 1. June 2020 Page 111-120.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (sampurasunjournal@unpas.ac.id) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Withdrawal Penalty
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.
