SUNDA'S LOCAL ASSISTANCE IN LEADERSHIP
AbstractSundanese local wisdom is the values resulting from the wisdom of the Sundanese people in carrying out their lives as people, rishis and kings. The kings of Sundanese at that time in leading were guided by the characteristics a leader must have written in the ancient Sanghyang Siksakandang Karesian script. Method using the literature review method by analyzing the literature on Sundanese leadership in the past and in the present. The results of data analysis from several journals discuss Sundanese local wisdom in leadership issues based on the ancient Siksakandang Karesian text, which explains that Sundanese leadership is guided by parigeuing. The figure of an ideal leader must stick to the astaguna principle of "eight wisdoms", so that his leadership is harmonious, good, and harmonious. The eight wisdoms as stated by Darsa (1998) are as follows: Animan (gentle), Ahiman (firm), Mahiman (broad-minded, Lagiman (agile / nimble / skilled), Prapti (right on target), Prakamya (tenacious / diligent) , Isitwa (honest), Wasitwa (open to criticism) This Sundanese leadership figure has weaknesses, because openness and admiration are one of the obstacles that make it difficult for Sundanese people to compete at the national level with Javanese ethnicities. Keywords: Local Wisdom, Leadership, Sundanese
Engkoswara. (2002). Lembaga Pendidikan Sebagai Pusat Pembudayaan: Hidup Harmoni di Keluarga, Sekolah dan di Masyarakat. Bandung: Yayasan Amal Keluarga.
Nurwansah, Ilham, (2017) Hukum dalam Naskah Sunda Kuna, Sanghyang Siksa Kandang Karesian, Jurnal Manassa: Manuskripta, Volume 7, Nomor 1, 2017, hal. 31
Padmawijaya , Rusya’i , Siti Khodijah,(2014) Kearifan Budaya Sunda dalam Peralihan Kepemimpinan Kerajaan Sunda Di Kawali setelah Perang Bubat, Jurnal Artefak Vol. 2 No. 1 – Maret 2014 [ISSN: 2355-5726], Hlm: 151 – 162
Ajip Rosidi. (2011). “Urang Sunda di Lingkungan Indonesia.”Orasi ilmiah pada pengukuhan Gelar Doctor Honoris Causa bidang Ilmu Budaya Fakultas Sastra Universitas Padjadjaran.31 Januari 2011.
Anne Ahira. (2011). “Perempuan dalam Budaya Suku Sunda”.Tersedia [http://www.anneahira.com/budaya-suku-sunda.htm].27 Januari 2011.
Dewi Kurniasih. (2010). “Kepemimpinan Politik Orang Sunda.” Majalah Ilmiah Unikom, Vol. 5 hlm.123-132.
Eddy D. Iskandar. (2006) “Gagade Bari Nyarande, Falsafah Kepemimpinan (Keluarga) Sunda.” Pikiran Rakyat, 4 Agustus 2006.
Elis Suryani N.S. (2010). “Pemimpin Ideal Dalam Naskah Sunda.” Harian Umum Pikiran Rakyat. 2 Februari 2010.
Gurniwan Kamil Pasya. (2010) Peranan Wanita dalam Kepemimpinan dan Politik. Makalah.Jurusan Pendidikan Geografi FPIPS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Jakob Sumardjo. (2007). “Paham Kekuasaan Sunda.” Harian Umum Pikiran Rakyat. 1 Januari 2007.
Jacob Sumardjo, “Trias Politika Sunda,” Pikiran Rakyat, 29 Pebruari 2004. fortiusfidelius.blogspot.com/.../silih-asah-silih-asih-silih-asuh.html–
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (email@example.com) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.