THE DELIBERATIVE GOVERNANCE IN LABOUR POLICY INNOVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v11i1.22491Keywords:
Policy Innovation, Manpower Development, Deliberative GovernanceAbstract
Abstract This study aims to analyse and examine how global value of deliberative governance of labour policies in Banyumas local government operates with a cultural heritage. By descriptive methods through in-depth interviews, policy studies, and observations of 100 relevant key-informants, it can be concluded that labour policy deliberations are not yet fully deliberative. Otherwise, labour policy deliberations held by non-governmental organizations are actually more deliberative. Among other things, this is due to the more free, open, democratic and autonomous interaction patterns and communication flows held by non-governmental organizations. The next factor is due to the fact that the selection of policy deliberation actors has not been carried out through random selection, the discussion agenda has not discussed labour protection issues comprehensively, the supervision of post-policy deliberation proposals at the district level is very difficult to do, and the participation employers is still at the level of pseudo-participation. Based on these conditions, efforts need to be made starting from the expansion of new public spaces, increasing the deliberation budget, selection of actors based on competence and authority, dissemination, more massive information dissemination of the labour protection policy agenda, and the intensity of labour and employer meetings so that industrial relations in the labour protection agenda can run dynamically and be able to realize an increase in the number of protected workers. With policy deliberation, it is expected that a new consensus will be enhanced in order to prevent conflicts of labour more early. Keywords: Policy Innovation, Manpower Development, Deliberative GovernanceDownloads
References
Abdullah, N. N., & Abdul Rahman, M. F. (2017). The Use of Deliberative Democracy in Public Policy Making Process. SSRN Electronic Journal, July. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2769105
Adam, D. (2023). The consensus projects. Nature,617 (May 18, 2023), 452-454.
Albrecht, N. (2024). Parties Are Not the Only Patrons: Towards a New Typology of Patronage. Brazilian Political Science Review,18 (3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202400030001
Alma'arif, & Wargadinata, E. L. (2022). Adopting Open Government in Local Development Planning. Journal of Public Policy and Administration,26 (1), 18-32. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap
Araos, M. (2023). Democracy underwater: public participation, technical expertise, and climate infrastructure planning in New York City. In Theory and Society (Vol. 52, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09459-9
Baekgaard, M., Mortensen, P. B., & Seeberg, H. B. (2018). The bureaucracy and the policy agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,28 (2), 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux045
Baillie, A., Skivington, K., Fergie, G., & Mackenzie, M. (2022). Participatory and deliberative processes in the UK related to income insecurity: a scoping review. The Lancet,400 , S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02228-0
Banha, F., Flores, A., & Coelho, L. S. (2022). A New Conceptual Framework and Approach to Decision Making in Public Policy. Knowledge,2 (4), 539-556. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2040032
Beccarini, I., Beunza, D., Ferraro, F., & Hoepner, A. G. F. (2023). The Contingent Role of Conflict: Deliberative Interaction and Disagreement in Shareholder Engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly,33 (1), 26-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.46
Benson, J. (2021). The epistemic value of deliberative democracy: how far can diversity take us? Synthese,199 (3-4), 8257-8279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03161-0
Berglund, O., Dunlop, C. A., Koebele, E. A., & Weible, C. M. (2022). Transformational change through Public Policy. Policy and Politics,50 (3), 302-322. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557322X16546739608413
Bittar, A. de V., & Di Serio, L. C. (2024). Do innovation policies support micro and small enterprises to overcome barriers? Innovation and Management Review,21 (2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2021-0234
Blokker, P., & Gül, V. (2023). Citizen deliberation and constitutional change. Deliberative Constitution-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, 29-46. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327165-3
Blomkamp, E., Sholikin, M. N., Nursyamsi, F., Lewis, J. M., & Toumbourou, T. (2018). Understanding Policymaking in Indonesia: KSI Working Paper,26 , 1-45. https://www.ksi-indonesia.org/assets/uploads/original/2020/03/ksi-1585501090.pdf
Bobbio, L. (2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society,38 (1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193
Brookfield Institute. (2018). Exploring Policy Innovation: Tools, Techniques + Approaches. 1–26.
Case, T. (2023). Revisiting Deliberative Governance: 51–62.
Chwalisz, C. (2020a). Good practice principles for deliberative processes for public decision making. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions, 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1787/b40aab2a-en
Chwalisz, C. (2020b). Good practice principles for deliberative processes for public decision making. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. https://doi.org/10.1787/b40aab2a-en
Dorren, L., & Wolf, E. E. A. (2023). How evidence-based policymaking helps and hinders policy conflict. Policy and Politics,51 (3), 486-507. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16836237135216
Firdaus Yusdiansyah, M., & Sumanto, A. (2022). The Effect of Labor Welfare on Performance in the UD Surya Onix Marble Industry. Primanomics: Journal of Economics and Business,20 (3), 104-121. https://jurnal.ubd.ac.id/index.php/ds
Giraudet, L. G., Apouey, B., Arab, H., Baeckelandt, S., Bégout, P., Berghmans, N., Blanc, N., Boulin, J. Y., Buge, E., Courant, D., Dahan, A., Fabre, A., Fourniau, J. M., Gaborit, M., Granchamp, L., Guillemot, H., Jeanpierre, L., Landemore, H., Laslier, J. F., ... Tournus, S. (2022). "Co-construction" in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,9 (1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6
Hart, O. D., & Zingales, L. (2022). The New Corporate Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 833-903. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4087738
Hartnett, T. (2024). The basics of consensus decision making. 1–5. http://www.groupfacilitation.net
Haryoko, S., Bahartiar, & Arwadi, F. (2020). Qualitative Research Data Analysis (Concepts, Techniques, & Analysis Procedures).
Hassanein, E. A., Samak, N., & Abdelaziz, S. (2024). The synergetic effect of economic complexity and governance on quality of life: policy thresholds. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03577-2
Haugsgjerd Allern, E., Klüver, H., Marshall, D., Otjes, S., Rasmussen, A., & Witko, C. (2022). Policy positions, power and interest group-party lobby routines. Journal of European Public Policy,29 (7), 1029-1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1912148
He, B. (2018). Deliberative citizenship and deliberative governance: a case study of one deliberative experiment in China. Citizenship Studies,22 (3), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1424800
Holdo, M. (2019). Power and Citizen Deliberation: The Contingent Impacts of Power and Citizen Deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation,15 (3). https://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd
Hünermund, P., & Czarnitzki, D. (2019). Innovation policy and causality. CESifo DICE Report, 17(4), 3–6.
Ichsani, S., Putri, A. R. P. T., Aprianto, F., Hermawan, H., & Hanavi, R. (2021). Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism on Company Profitability Ratios. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 1793–1805.
Jacob, F. (2023). The National Labor Relations Act, the Major Questions Doctrine, and Labor Peace in the Modern Workplace. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1381-1445. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4535075
Jacobs, D., & Kaufmann, W. (2021). The right kind of participation? The effect of a deliberative mini-public on the perceived legitimacy of public decision-making. Public Management Review,23 (1), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668468
Jacquet, V., & van der Does, R. (2021a). Deliberation and Policy-Making: Three Ways to Think About Minipublics' Consequences. Administration and Society,53 (3), 468-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720964511
Jacquet, V., & van der Does, R. (2021b). Deliberation and Policy-Making: Three Ways to Think About Minipublics' Consequences. Administration and Society,53 (3), 468-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720964511
Jani, J., & Suryadinata, S. (2023). The Influence of Leadership Style on Employee Performance. Scientific Journal of Unity Management,11 (3), 1519-1528. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v11i3.2233
Kamran, M., Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M., & Anwar, S. (2023). Does Inclusive Growth Contribute Towards Sustainable Development? Evidence from Selected Developing Countries. Social Indicators Research,165 (2), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-03020-6
Katharina, R. (2018). Deliberative Formulation of Papua Special Autonomy Policy. BUSINESS & BUREAUCRACY: Journal of Administrative and Organizational Sciences,24(2), 69–77. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jbbhttps://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jbb/vol24/iss2/2
Knappe, H. (2019). Participatory and Deliberative Democracy: Doing Democracy Differently, 45-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbkk41f.8
Koskimaa, V., & Raunio, T. (2023). Curtailing political short-termism in legislatures: a trade-off between influence and institutionalization? European Journal of Futures Research,11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-023-00220-2
Le, N., Siddique, A. B., Jamour, F., Oymak, S., & Hristidis, V. (2021). Predictable and Adaptive Goal-oriented Dialog Policy Generation. Proceedings - 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC 2021, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC50631.2021.00012
Li, L., & Wang, H. (2023). Influence of Green Investment on China's Sustainable Development. Sustainability (Switzerland),15 (12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129804
Manosevitch, I. (2024). Cultivating Deliberative Citizenship Orientations in Communication Studies. 18, 4511–4532.
Martin-Caballero, A. (2023). Understanding Conflict over Regulation of Platform Work: a Critical Literature Review on the Role of Institutions, Networks and Frames in Policy-Making. Relations Industrielles,78 (4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7202/1111506ar
Mitchell, P., Reinap, M., Moat, K., & Kuchenmüller, T. (2023). An ethical analysis of policy dialogues. Health Research Policy and Systems,21 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00962-2
Mohiya, M. (2024). What constitutes an employer of choice? A qualitative triangulation investigation. Human Resources for Health,22 (1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00928-7
Morgan, H. (2024). Using Triangulation and Crystallization to Make Qualitative Studies Trustworthy and Rigorous. The Qualitative Report,29 (7), 1844-1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071
Mouwn Erland. (2020). Qualitative Research Methodology. In Qualitative Research Methodology. In Rake Sarasin (Issue March).
Nasriza, & F. Yasmeardi. (2020). Design of Local Government Public Policy Innovation in Facing the Challenges of Globalization. Journal of Public Administration, Business and Rural Development Planning, 2(1), 38–50.
Niemeyer, S., Veri, F., Dryzek, J. S., & Bächtiger, A. (2023). How Deliberation Happens: Enabling Deliberative Reason. American Political Science Review,46 (3), 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423000023
Nurcahyo, N. (2021). Legal protection of labor based on laws and regulations in Indonesia. Journal of Legal Cakrawala,12 (1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i1.5781
Nurhalimah, S. (2018). Legal Protection of Indonesian Workers. 'Adalah,1 (1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v1i1.8200
Paignton, M. B. (2021). Labour needs policies the public will admire: Letters. 1–2.
Penders, B. (2022). Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society,42 (4), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221126388
Peters, B. G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy. In The Politics of Bureaucracy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813653-5
Pilet, J. B., Bol, D., Vittori, D., & Paulis, E. (2023). Public support for deliberative citizens' assemblies selected through sortition: Evidence from 15 countries. European Journal of Political Research,62 (3), 873-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12541
President of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Optimizing the Implementation of the Employment Social Security Program. Employment.
Rachmawati, I. N. (2007). Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews. Indonesian Journal of Nursing, 11(1), 35–40.
Revez, A., Dunphy, N., Harris, C., Rogan, F., Byrne, E., McGookin, C., Bolger, P., Ó Gallachóir, B., Barry, J., Ellis, G., O'Dwyer, B., Boyle, E., Flood, S., Glynn, J., & Mullally, G. (2022). Mapping emergent public engagement in societal transitions: a scoping review. Energy, Sustainability and Society,12 (1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00330-4
Robert, E., Rajan, D., Koch, K., Muggleworth Weaver, A., Porignon, D., & Ridde, V. (2020). Policy dialogue as a collaborative tool for multistakeholder health governance: A scoping study. BMJ Global Health,4 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002161
Ryu, K. (2018). Labor market dualism and the wage penalty for temporary employment: Evidence on the interplay of employment protection legislation and labor market institutions from PIAAC data. Development and Society,47 (4), 535-561. https://doi.org/10.21588/dns/2018.47.4.002
Setiyono, B., & Chalmers, I. (2018). Labor protection policy in a third world economy: The case of Indonesia. Development and Society,47 (1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.21588/dns/2018.47.1.006
Shin, B., & Rask, M. (2021). Assessment of online deliberative quality: New indicators using network analysis and time-series analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland),13 (3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031187
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Theories of democratic network governance. Theories of Democratic Network Governance, January 2007, 1-342. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006
Studies, M., Studies, M., Studies, M., & Studies, M. (2023). New Public Governance and Undermining of the Public Interest in Zambia Moses Chewe Clever Madimutsa Evans Daka Justina Namukombo. 3(2), 5–26.
Suhartoyo, S. (2019). Legal Protection for Workers in the National Labor Law System. Administrative Law and Governance Journal,2 (2), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.326-336
Syariyah, N. N., Nur, T., & Meigawati, D. (2020). Implementation of Employment Policy on Job Exchange at the Sukabumi City Manpower Office. Public Spirit: Journal of Public Administration,15 (2), 158. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v15i2.42567
Talukder, D., & Pilet, J. B. (2021). Public support for deliberative democracy. A specific look at the attitudes of citizens from disadvantaged groups. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research,34 (5), 656-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1978284
Tan, M. (2019). Regional Innovation Policy in the Implementation of Regional Government. Rakornas Kelitbangan Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, 33.
Tiwari, A., Saha, T., Saha, S., Sengupta, S., Maitra, A., Ramnani, R., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2021). A dynamic goal adapted task oriented dialogue agent. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 16, Issue 4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249030
Turi, J. A., Ullah, S., Barykin, S. E., Basher, A., & Zaytsev, A. (2024). Good Governance Through Sustained Developmental Projects. UCJC Business and Society Review,21 (80), 356-393. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2024.V21.N1.09
University of Canberra. (2019). Codesign and deliberative democracy. What works. 3.
Vozab, D., Trbojević, F., & Peruško, Z. (2024). Finding the path to deliberative communication. In European Media Systems for Deliberative Communication. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003476597-8
Williamson, A. K., & Luke, B. G. (2019). Publicness and the Identity of Public Foundations. Foundation Review,11 (3), 68-80. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1482
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal Sampurasun : Interdisciplinary Studies for Cultural Heritage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (sampurasunjournal@unpas.ac.id) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Withdrawal Penalty
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.
