SOCIAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF KAMPUNG KOTA: A CASE STUDY IN BANDUNG INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v7i2.2168Keywords:
Community Participation, Kampung Kota, DevelopmentAbstract
Kampung Kota has been associated with slums due to its substandard living condition despite having different characteristics to slums. To improve the quality of life of Kampung Kota community; it is important to actively involve the community itself to transform Kampung Kota to better direction and to exercise the democracy within urban development. The research aims to understand in what ways the community has been involved, how the community perceived their involvement, how the community wish to be involved and in what ways community participation could be improved in transforming Mekarjaya and maximizing its social capital. The research was conducted using qualitative methodology and case study strategy. Interviews, observation and documentary evidences are used to collect the data and to validate the date by cross-checking every information using triangulation technique. The research finds that the community has not been actively involved in many programs and projects due to the nature of the government programs that support the funding. However, most of the people; whose voice are generally represented by the head of RT/RW (Community unit/neighbourhood unit); are far more eager and willingly contribute to the development if they have the platform to do so.Downloads
References
Archer, D., Luansang, C. and Boonmahathanakorn, S., 2012. Facilitating community mapping and planning for citywide upgrading: the role of community architects. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), pp.115-129.
Arnstein, S., 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp.216-224.
Arputham, J., 2012. How community-based enumerations started and developed in India. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), pp.27-30.
Davidoff, P., 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), pp.331-338.
Davies, R., 2010. community Engagement in Planning. Planning News, 36(7), p.18.
Direktorat Jenderal Cipta Karya (Ditjen Cipta Karya)., 2017., Sekilas Informasi Program Kota Tanpa Kumuh (KOTAKU)., [online] available at: http://kotaku.pu.go.id/pustakadetil.asp?mid=483&catid=5& [accessed 8 September 217]
Funo, S., Yamamoto, N. and Silas, J., 2002. Typology of kampung houses and their transformation process. Journal of Asian architecture and building engineering, 1(2), pp.2_193-200.
Fox, S., 2014. The political economy of slums: Theory and evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 54, pp.191-203.
Gilbert, A., 2007. The return of the slum: does language matter?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), pp.697-713.
Habitat, U.N., 2003. Global Report on Human Settlements 2003: The Challenge of Slums. London: Earthscan.
Handayani, S., 2008. Partisipasi Masyarakat Kampung Kota untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Lingkungan Perkotaan. Disertasi. Program Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Hooper, M. and Ortolano, L., 2012. Motivations for slum dweller social movement participation in urban Africa: a study of mobilization in Kurasini, Dar es Salaam. Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), pp.99-114.
IAP2., 2015., Quality Assurance Standard. [online] IAP2 Australasia. Available at: https://www.iap2.org.au/Tenant/C0000004/00000001/files/IAP2_Quality_Assurance_Standard_2015.pdf [Accessed 12 Nov. 2017].
Kawamura, K., 2011. Consensus and democracy in Indonesia: Musyawarah-Mufakat revisited.
Kustiwan, I., & Ramadhan, A. (2019). Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Lingkungan Kampung-Kota dalam Rangka Pembangunan Kota yang Inklusif dan Berkelanjutan: Pembelajaran dari Kasus Kota Bandung. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning (Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Perdesaan), 3(1), 64-84.
Maslow, A.H., 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50(4), p.370.
Nasir, S. and Rosenthal, D., 2009. The lorong as a risk environment: Drug use and gangs among young men in the slums of Makassar, Indonesia. Contemporary Drug Problems, 36(1-2), pp.193-215.
Nastiti, A., Muntalif, B.S., Roosmini, D., Sudradjat, A., Meijerink, S.V. and Smits, A.J.M., 2017. Coping with poor water supply in peri-urban Bandung, Indonesia: Towards a framework for understanding risks and aversion behaviours. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), pp.69-88.
Njoh, A.J., 2015. An OLS analysis of the impact of colonialism on inter-country differentials in slum incidence in Africa. Cities, 44, pp.104-111.
P2KP., 2017., Profil Slum. [online] P2KP. Available at: http://sim.p2kp.org/p2kp/report/profil_kumuh.php?kode=3273 [Accessed 31 Jul. 2017].
Permana, A. Y., Susanti, I., & Wijaya, K. (2019). Kerentanan Bahaya Kebakaran di Kawasan Kampung Kota. Kasus: Kawasan Balubur Tamansari Kota Bandung. Jurnal Arsitektur ZONASI, 2(1), 32-45.
Peters, R., 2009. The assault on occupancy in Surabaya: legible and illegible landscapes in a city of passage. Development and Change, 40(5), pp.903-925.
Peters, R., 2010, The Wheels of Misfortune: The Street and Cycles of Displacement in Surabaya, Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(4), pp.568-588.
Peters, R., 2013, Surabaya, 1945-2010; Neighbourhood, State and Indonesia's City of Struggle, NUS Press: Singapore.
Reerink, G., 2011. Tenure security for Indonesia’s urban poor: A socio-legal study on land, decentralisation, and the rule of law in Bandung. Leiden University Press.
Samba, R.D., de Pee, S., Kraemer, K., Sun, K., Thorne-Lyman, A., Moench-Pfanner, R., Sari, M., Akhter, N. and Bloem, M.W., 2009. Purchase of drinking water is associated with increased child morbidity and mortality among urban slum-dwelling families in Indonesia. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 212(4), pp.387-397.
Seputar Indonesia., 2013., Bandung Masih Miliki 29 Kawasan Kumuh. [online] Available at: https://economy.okezone.com/read/2017/02/15/470/1618737/bandung-masih-miliki-29-kawasan-kumuh [Accessed 8 Aug. 2017].
Silas, J., 1992. Government-community partnerships in Kampung improvement programmes in Surabaya. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), pp.33-41.
Silas, J., 1989. Marginal settlements in surabaya, Indonesia: problem or potential?. Environment and Urbanization, 1(2), pp.60-70
Solikhah, N., & Fatimah, T. (2020). Kampung hijau pada kampung kota (studi kasus: Kampung Tanjung Gedong RT. 05/RW. 08, Jakarta Barat). Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(1).
Turner, John FC., 1976 Housing by People., London, Whitstable Litho Ltd. Kent.
Widjaja, P., 2013. Kampung Kota Bandung., Graha Ilmu: Yogyakarta
Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research: Design and methods . Thousands Oaks. Sage. Young, LC and Wilkinson, IR (1989). The role of trust and co-operation in marketing channels: a preliminary study. European Journal of Marketing, 23(2), pp.109-122.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (sampurasunjournal@unpas.ac.id) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Withdrawal Penalty
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.