PUBLIC SATISFACTION INDEX (IKM) SURVEY AT DEPARTMENT OF INVESTMENT AND ONE STOP INTEGRATED SERVICE (DPMPTSP) IN SUBANG REGENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/sampurasun.v4i02.1066Keywords:
Decentralisation, Public Satisfaction, Public Satisfaction Index.Abstract
In accordance with the mandate of the law, changes in the system of governance in the region have changed from a centralized model to decentralization. This is characterized by the devolution of most government affairs to the region including the implementation of fiscal decentralization directed to finance the administration of government affairs. Law Number 25 Year 2009 concerning Public Service and Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparaturs and Bureaucracy Reform Number 16 Year 2014 on Guidelines for the Survey of the Public Satisfaction Index on Public Service Implementation recommends that every service provider conduct a Public Satisfaction Index (IKM) survey periodically. This research uses deductive quantitative method. Primary data is obtained through direct survey and interview. The data were obtained using questionnaires with closed questions. Types of sample are purposive sampling counted 240 people. The purpose of the survey of IKM on public service units is intended to get opinion of the public regarding the quality of public services in Department of Investment and One Stop Integrated Service (DPMPTSP), Subang Regency. The IKM survey is conducted on four service units, namely Building Permit (IMB), Business License (SIUP), Company Registration Certificate (TDP) and Industrial Registration Certificate (TDI). Measurement of IKM survey of public services using PERMENPANRB Number 16 Year 2014 which consists of 9 aspects: 1) Requirements; 2) Procedures; 3) Time of service; 4) Costs / Tariffs; 5) Product Specifications Type of Service; 6) Executing Competencies; 7) Executive Conduct; 8) Service Notice; and 9) Complaint Handling, Suggestions and Feedback. IKM from four types of public services in Subang Regency DPMPTSP of 3.20 or if converted by 79.89. The results of the IKM are in the category of Quality of Service Performance B (Good).Downloads
References
Akinboade, Akinloye., Oludele, Kinfack., Chanceline., Emilie, & Mokwena, Putuma., Mandisa. (2012). An analysis of citizen satisfaction with public service delivery in the Seding district municipality of South Africa. International Journal of Social Economics,39, 3,182-199.
Alamsyah, Kamal.(2017). Community satisfaction to regional public hospital Banjar city. Public Policy and Administration Research,7 (5),16-29.
Albrecht, K., & L.J. Bradford. (1990). The service advantage: How to identify and fulfill customer needs. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin.
Arief, Muhtosim.(2006). Pemasaran jasa & kualitas pelayanan:Bagaimana mengelola kualitas pelayanan agar memuaskan pelanggan. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Bastian, Indra, (2001). Akuntansi sektor publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Brajaktari, Elinor. (2016). Citizen engagement in public service delivery. The critical role of public officials. Singapore:Global Centre for Public Service Exellence.
Benardin, H.J.&J.E.A., Russel.(1993). Human resource management. Singapore: Mac Graw- Hill, Inc.
Denhardt, J.V. & R. B. Denhardt. (2003). The new public service: Serving not steering. Expanded Edition. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Dharma, Agus. (2008). Manajemen prestasi kerja. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Dwiyanto, Agus.(2010).Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia.Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.
Handi, Irawan. (2002). Prinsip kepuasan pelanggan.Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Kompetindo.
Keban, Yeremias.,T.(2004). Enam dimensi strategis administrasi publik: Konsep, teori dan isu, Yogyakarta: PT. Gava Media.
Kurniawan, Agung. (2005). Transformasi pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta:Pembaruan.
Kotler, J.,P. (2003). Leading change. Harvard: Harvard Bussines School Press.
Wirtz, Jochen., & Lovelock, Christoper.(1997). Services Marketing. Eight Ed. USA: World Scientific Publishing Co. Inc.
La Palombara. (1967). Bureaucracy and political development.New Jersey: Prenticeton University Press.
Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, Yogyakarta : UPP STIM YKPN
Moenir. (2003) Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia, Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Mc Mann, Paul., & Alfred, J., Nanni.(1994). Is your company really measuring perfor-mance.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Osborne, David., & Ted, Gaebler. (1996).Mewirausahakan birokrasi (Reinventing Government) mentransformasikan semangat wirausaha ke dalam sektor publik, Terjemahan, Jakarta: PT. Binaman Presindo
Osborne, David and Plastrik, 2001, Memangkas birokrasi : lima strategi menuju pemerintahan wirausaha, Terjemahan, Jakarta : PPM
Osborne, David. (2007),” Reinventing government: what a difference a strategy makes”, Paper of Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government, 26-29 June, 2007, Vienna, Austria.
Rasul, Syahrudin.(2000). Pengukuran kinerja : suatu tinjauan pada instansi pemerintah. Jakarta : BPKP
Ratminto. Winarsih., & Septi, Atik. (2005). Manajemen pelayanan : pengembangan model konseptual , penerapan, citizen’s charter dan stándar pelayanan minimal.Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Shah, Anwar.(2005). Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series.Public Service Delivery. Washington DC:The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Supriatna, Tjahya .(2004). Birokrasi pemerintahan indonesia.Bandun : Mandar Maju
Soesilo, Joko. (2005). Memahami good governance dalam perspektif sumber daya manusia, Yogyakarta: Gava Media
Sampara, Lukman.(2000).Manajemen kualitas pelayanan. Jakarta: STIA LAN Press
Sinambela, Poltak., Lijan. (2006). Reformasi pelayanan public. Jakarta : PT. Bumi Aksara
Soeprihanto, John.(2001).Penilaian kinerja dan pembangunan karyawan. Edisi I, Yogyakarta: BPFE
Supriatna, Tjahya, 1996, Birokrasi Pemerintahan Indonesia. Bandung : Mandar Maju
Sumaryana, Asep.(2010). Reformasi birokrasi dan pelayanan. Bandung: AIPI-LPPM UNPAD
Tjiptono, Fandy.(2005). Prinsip-prinsip total quality service. Yogyakarta: ANDI OFFSET
Tjiptono, Fandy., & Chandra, Gregorius. (2007). Service, quality & satisfaction. Edisi 2. Yogyakarta : ANDY OFFSET
Vacaloupoulou, Melpomeni., A, Tsiotras, George., & Gotzamani, Katerina, (2013). Implementing CAF in public administration. Best practices in Europe-obstacles and challenges. Benchmarking: An International Journal,20, 6, 744-764.
Wibawa, Samudra.(2005). Peluang penerapan new public management untuk kabupaten di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Wicaksono, Kristian., W. (2005). Administrasi dan birokrasi pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Wiig, M., Karl, (2002), “Knowledge management in public administration” Journal of Knowledge Management,6, 3,224-239.
Zeithaml, Valerie., A., Parasuraman., A., & Barry, Leonard L. (1990). Delivering quality of Service : Balancing customer perception and expectation. New York : The Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors should not withdraw their submitted papers because the withdrawal wastes voluntary works devoted by an associate editor and reviewers. But, we accept the withdrawal of a submitted paper if authors have unavoidable reasons. In the event that a manuscript is to be withdrawn from submission to Sampurasun Journal, a letter must be sent to the editorial office requesting withdrawal by e-mail (sampurasunjournal@unpas.ac.id) with its scanned PDF file, before the notification of acceptance for publication.
The withdraw request letter must include the following information. Paper ID, Paper title, Authors names, Reason why the paper must be withdrawn, and Date and signatures of all the authors (or signature of the contact author).
If only the contact author signs the letter, he/she must obtain the agreement of the withdrawal from all the other authors and the letter must include the description that all the other authors agreed the withdrawal. The journal will not withdraw a manuscript from peer review until such a letter has been received. Authors must not assume their manuscript has been withdrawn until they have received appropriate notification from the editorial office. Withdrawal of a manuscript subsequent to acceptance for publication will only be granted in the most exceptional of circumstances.
After the paper is accepted for publication, the withdrawal is not permitted in principle. The authors must always pay the charge even if the withdrawal is permitted. Any request of withdrawal that does not follow the above procedure is treated as invalid. If illegal submission, e.g., plagiarized or duplicate submission, is found for a paper, the withdrawal of the paper will never be permitted and the authors will be punished based on the rule. It is not acceptable practice to withdraw a manuscript in the event of acceptance at another journal. This constitutes dual submission. The editorial office of the other journal will be notified of your actions. In such circumstances Sampurasun ISCH may chose to impose appropriate punitive action subject.
Withdrawal Penalty
Author is not allowed to withdraw submitted manuscripts, because the withdrawal is waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscript, money and works invested by the publisher. If author still requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, author will be punished with paying $200 per manuscript, as withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal. The withdrawal of manuscript after the manuscript is accepted for publication, author will be punished by paying US$500 per manuscript. Withdrawal of manuscript is only allowed after withdrawal penalty has been fully paid to the Publisher. If author don't agree to pay the penalty, the author and his/her affiliation will be blacklisted for publication in this journal. Even, his/her previously published articles will be removed from our online system.
