SUPERVISION OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN DEVELOPING IN-DEPTH LEARNING ASSESSMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/pics-j.v8i02.41987Keywords:
Teacher Assistance, Learning Assessment, In-depth Learning, Elementary SchoolAbstract
Assessment is a crucial component of deep learning because it serves not only to assess learning outcomes but also to support students' thinking processes, conceptual understanding, and reflection. However, elementary school teachers still face various obstacles in developing assessments that align with deep learning principles. This community service activity aims to assist elementary school teachers in developing deep learning assessments at SDN Ketidur Mojokerto. The community service method uses a participatory approach through questionnaire-based needs analysis, assistance in developing assessment instruments, limited implementation, and reflection and evaluation. The questionnaire results indicate that most teachers have a good understanding of the concept of deep learning assessments, but still experience difficulties in developing instruments to assess learning processes and outcomes. Through the mentoring activity, teachers are able to develop authentic, task-based assessments and rubrics that assess students' deep understanding and thinking processes. This activity contributes to improving teachers' competency in designing applicable and contextual deep learning assessments in elementary schools.
Downloads
References
Aslam, A., Ahamd, S., Siller, H.-S., & Nasreen, A. (2024). Impact of the Understanding by Design Model on the Science Academic Achievement of Fifth Grade Students in Pakistan (Vol. 10). https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10078
Black, P., & London, C. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. 1(1), 1–40.
Brookhart, S. (2020). Five Formative Assessment Strategies to Improve Distance Learning Outcomes for Students with Disabilities (Issue 20).
Darling-hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development (Issue June).
Dávila, A. (2017). Wiggins , G ., & McTighe , J . ( 2005 ) Understanding by design ( 2nd ed .). Alexandria , VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD. 19(1), 140–142.
Hastuti, W. S., Widyaningtyas, F. S., Wati, U. A., & Kusumah, S. A. (2025). Understanding by Design ( UbD ): An Effective Way to Design Elementary School Science Learning for the Competencies of Teacher Professional Education Students. 17, 3952–3965. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.6893
Kemmis, S., & Mctaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research. 559–603.
Leslie, O. W. (2016). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom ’ s Taxonomy Revised.
Magdalena, I., Arwindi, S., Hasan, S. N., & Tangerang, U. M. (2023). DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS. 3(1), 29–46.
