PENODAAN AGAMA DI MEDIA SOSIAL DAN DAMPAK HUKUMNYA: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK

Authors

  • Dheni Budiman Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung
  • Dadang Sudana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • ndika Dutha Bachari Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Marlia Universitas Pasudan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/literasi.v16i1.28534

Keywords:

blasphemy, legal impact, social media, verdict

Abstract

Indonesia is not a religious state, but the state guarantees freedom of religion and every citizen has the right to embrace religion according to their beliefs. This implies that the state is obliged to make  regulation to protect its citizens, and prohibit anyone from committing blasphemy. However, in fact practices of intolerance in religion, namely blasphemy are found. The purpose of this research is to find out what lexical meanings appear in blasphemy; knowing the purpose of blasphemy; and uncovering and describing the impact of blasphemy on social media. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with a forensic linguistic study approach. From the results of this reseach, it can be concluded that; 1) the lexical meanings appearing in the research data are grouped into six groups, 2) the purpose of blasphemy on social media is utterances to hate, insult the dignity of religion, 3) the legal impact of blasphemy on social media is by imposing a court judge's verdict on a defendant who is proven to have committed blasphemy on social media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things with Words. In Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cotteril, J. (2003). Age and power in the court: A linguistic analysis of the O.J. Simpson trial. Houndmills: Palgrave.

Devit. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Penistaan Agama Melalui Media Sosial Ditinjau Dari Undang-UndangInformasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Scientia Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3.

Gibbons, J. (2013). Forensic Linguistics, an Introduction to Langguage In the Justice System. In Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Hatta, M., & Zulfan, H. (2021). Kejahatan Penistaan Agama Dan Konsekuensi Hukumnya. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 13, 344. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v13i2.4532. ISSN 1979-4940/ISSN-E 2477-0124

Hendrastuti, & Retno. (2019). Sikap Media Asing Dalam Menyoroti Kasus Penistaan Agama (Foreign Media Attitude to Highlight Ahok’s Blashphemy Case). In Bale Bahasa Jawa Tengah. Sawerigading (Vol. 25).

Heydon, G. (2005). The Language of Police Interviewing. In Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.

Leech, G. (2014). Principles of Pragmatics. In New York: Routledge.

Lintang, L. C., Martufi, A., & Ouwerker, J. W. (2021). The Alternative Concepts of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia: Legal Comparison with Ireland and Canada. Bestuur, https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.51632.

Marmor, A. (2013). Truth in Law. Law and language, 45–61.

Martin, & White. (2007). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. In London: Palgrave.

Setiabudi, Mukhlisa, Mau M, B. T. (2022). Framing Berita Penistaan Agama M. Kece dalam Portal Berita Kompas. Com. Jurnalisa, 8, https://doi.org/10.24252/jurnalisa.v8i1.26735.

Sobari, M., Desiyanti, A., Yanti, D., & Monika, P. (2023). Comparison of Spatial Weight Matrices in Spatial Autoregressive Model : Case Study of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Indonesia. 7(1), 244–261.

Syah, A. (2024). Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penodaan Agama Melalui Media Sosial (The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement against Blasphemy through Social Media). Supremasi: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum, & Pengajarannya. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/supremasi. p-ISSN 1412 – 517X e-ISSN 2720 – 9369. Volume XIX Nomor 1, April 2024,hlm 192 – 201.

Syahid, A. et al. (2022). Perundungan Siber (CyberBullying) Yang Bermuatan Penistaan Agama Di Media Sosial Yang Berdampak Hukum. Kajian Linguistik Forensik., 11. DOI 10.22460/semantik.vl lil.p17-32

Tarigan, H. G. (2009). Pengkajian Pragmatik. In Bandung: Angkasa.

Tiersma, P. M. (2010). Parchment, paper, pixels: Law and the technologies of communication. University of Chicago Press, 65.

Wahid, & Sholehudin. (2023). Hukum Penodaan Agama Perspektif Fikih, Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Ghalizan, Mitsaqan :Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam. , 3, 2.

Wijana, & Putu, I. D. (1996). Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. In Yogyakarta: Andi.

Yogi, M. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Peran Kepolisian Dalam Melakukan Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Tindak Pidana Penodan Agama. Jurnal Pionir LPPM Universitas Asahan, 6.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. In Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Literasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Literasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Hak cipta artikel yang diterbitkan di jurnal ilmiah dimiliki oleh penerbit, bukan penulis. Hal ini berkaitan dengan koordinasi hak akses untuk cetak ulang atau penggunaan lainnya. Dalam hal ini penerbit mempunyai keluluasaan untuk mempublikasikan artikel sesuai dengan kesepakanan Transfer Agreement (penyerahan hak cipta) antara penerbit dengan penulis.