TRANSFORMASI STRATEGI KOMUNIKASI PENERIMAAN MAHASISWA BARU DI PTKIN UNTUK MENARIK MINAT GEN Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/linimasa.v9i1.40595Keywords:
Communication Strategy, Generation Z, Interest, New Student, TransformationAbstract
This study examines the transformation of new student admission strategies at State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN), with a focus on UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, in responding to the dynamics of Generation Z interest as the dominant demographic group of prospective students. Generation Z is characterized by dependence on digital information, a preference for interactive and flexible learning environments, and a strong orientation toward values and identity. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis involving university leaders, admissions staff, faculty representatives, and Generation Z students. Thematic analysis produced five main findings: (1) a transformation from a conventional bureaucratic model toward a technology-based adaptive system, such as SSE UMPTKIN and multiple selection pathways (SPAN-PTKIN, UMPTKIN); (2) Generation Z’s preference for digital engagement, authenticity, and career relevance; (3) the intensive use of digital tools, including Instagram, TikTok, webinars, and virtual campus tours as effective recruitment media; (4) efforts to balance Islamic identity with modern digital strategies; and (5) increased institutional competitiveness through strengthened branding and promotional reach. This study concludes that PTKIN’s transformation strategy strongly resonates with Generation Z through the integration of technological innovation and cultural authenticity. Social media campaigns and career-oriented messaging not only enhance prospective student engagement but also strengthen institutional credibility and differentiation. These findings contribute to broader discussions on educational transformation in Indonesia by highlighting how Islamic higher education institutions navigate the tension between tradition and innovation to remain sustainable and competitive.
Downloads
References
Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Innovations in Higher Education Industry – Shaping the Future. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 7(4), 283–311.
Akbari, D. A., Rochaety, E., Wulan, M., Purwandari, D., & Adji, F. (2024). Assessing the Engagement Strategies of Indonesia’s Top 5 Universities onInstagram. AGREGAT: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(2).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). To Saturate or not to Saturate? Questioning Data Saturation as a Useful Concept for Thematic Analysis and Sample-Size Rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed., Issue June). Sage Publications, Inc. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rulinawaty-
Kasmad/publication/342229325_Second_Edition_QUALITATIVE_INQUIRY_RESEARCH_DESIGN_Choosing_Among_Five_Approaches/links/5eec7025458515814a6ac263/Second-Edition-QUALITATIVE-INQUIRY-RESEARCH-DESIGN-Choosing-Among
Hall, H., & Peszko, K. (2016). Social Media as a Relationship Marketing Tool of Modern University. Marketing i Zarządzanie, 5(46).
Hasanah, S. M. (2017). Strategi Membangun Global Brand Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri (PTKIN) menuju World Class University. Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(2).
Hemsley-Brown, J., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market Orientation in Universities: A Comparative Study of Two National Higher Education Systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 201–220.
Hossler, D., & Kalsbeek, D. (2013). Enrollment Management and Managing Enrollments: Revisiting the Context for Institutional Strategy. The Strategic Enrollment Management Quarterly.
Huang, H., Binney, W., & Hede, A.-M. (2010). Strategic marketing of educational institutions. ANZMAC 2010 : Doing More with Less : Proceedings of the 2010 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, ANZMAC.
Joseph, M., Spake, D. F., & Albrecht, C. L. (2017). Branding Universities: An Updated View of Factors Underlying College Choice. In C. L. Campbell (Ed.), he Customer is NOT Always Right? Marketing Orientationsin a Dynamic Business World. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50008-9_101
Patra, T. I. (2022). Penggunaan Aplikasi Sistem Seleksi Elektronik (SSE) Pada Pelaksanaan Seleksi Masuk Jalur UM-PTKIN Tahun 2022. Edu-Mandara, 1(2).
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publication.
Santos, K. D. S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. D., & Silva, I. A. P. D. (2020). The Use of Multiple Triangulations as a Validation Strategy in a Qualitative Study. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, 25, 655–664.
Sariaslan, H. (2024). The Rise of A New World Order and The Role of Higher Education. Başkent Üniversitesi Ticari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 16–26.
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z Goes to College. Jossey-Bash.
Steinar, K. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage.
Tumiwa, S., Firdaus, M., & Razzaq, A. (2025). Strategi Branding Perguruan Tinggi Islam: UIN Raden Fatah Palembang di Media Online: Instagram. Dinamika Pendidikan Nusantara, 6(4), 394–407.
Turner, A. (2015). Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://helenagmartins.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/turner2015.pdf
Vera, F. (2024). Reimagining Higher Education : The Necessity for Transformational Change. REVISTA ELECTRÓNICA TRANSFORMAR TRANSFORMAR ELECTRONIC, 05(03), 23–35.
Zwick, R. (2017). Who Gets in? Strategies for fair and Effective College Admission. Harvard University Press.
