EVALUASI KEBIJAKAN TENTANG MANAJEMEN INOVASI PERGURUAN TINGGI (MIPT) DI PERGURUAN TINGGI NEGERI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v13i2.5166Keywords:
Evaluation, Higher Education Innovation Management, Policy.Abstract
ABSTRACT Policy Evaluation of the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education Regulation No. 24 of 2019 aims to encourage The University (PT) to manage innovations that impact people's lives. The management of innovation in State Universities (PTN) is not optimal as expected. For this reason, the implementation of Higher Education Innovation Management (MIPT) is expected to play an optimal role in facilitating and realizing the improvement, development, and utilization of research results in PTN. Steps and strategies are taken by the Ministry of Research and Technology (Kemristek)/National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) to realize research innovations in PT, specifically by encouraging the implementation of Innovation Management in their respective PT. In addition, they are providing technical guidance in measuring innovation performance to provide the expected results, namely strengthening innovation at PT. The implementation of MIPT in PTN has been effectively implemented and has become the primary goal of PTN, but there are still obstacles in its implementation. Several factors of emphasis in increasing the productivity of innovation performance are related to the number of researches, inventions, innovation products, strengthening innovation management institutional policies, and organizational arrangements that require the formation of innovation management institutions. The challenges of PTN in MIPT are related to the stages of commercializing innovation products to the industrial world, managing Intellectual Property Rights and Patents. Some recommendations that need to be considered are the need for continuity of socialization, the availability of technical modules that provide detailed explanations of what PTN must do in managing innovation and clarity of authority over the Regulation No. 24 of 2019 concerning MIPT. Keywords: Evaluation, Higher Education Innovation Management, PolicyDownloads
References
Borang Kinerja Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi, 2020. https://simanis.ristekbrin.go.id
Brinkerhoff, D.W and Crosby, B.L., 2002. Managing policy reform: concepts and tools for decision-makers in developing and transitioning countries. Bloomfield, USA: Kumarian Press, Inc.
Grindle, M.S. (1980). Public Choices and Policy Change: The Political Economy of Reform in Developing Countries. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Keputusan Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 213/M/KPT/2019 Tentang Klasterisasi dan Pemeringkatan Perguruan Tinggi, 2019.
Lester, J.P dan Steward, J.Jr. (2000). Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
Mazmanian, D.A & Sabatier, P.A (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview III Scott, Foresman and Company
Panduan Umum Penyelenggaraan Manajemen Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi. Direktorat Sistem Inovasi, 2018. Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi/Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. Jakarta
Palumbo, D.J (e.d). (1987). “The Politics of Program Evaluation”, Sage, Newbury Park, Cal.
Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 24 Tahun 2019 Tentang
Manajemen Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi, 2019, Jakarta
Rossi, Peter H., Mark W. Lipsey & Howard E. Freeman (1979). Evaluation: A Systemic Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
