PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DALAM COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE PADA PROGRAM SISTER CITY BANDUNG DAN JEPANG DALAM MENANGGULANGI SAMPAH DI KOTA BANDUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v13i1.5037Keywords:
Partisipasi Publik, Collaborative, Sister City.Abstract
Partisipasi publik dalam proses pembuatan keputusan akan mendatangkan keuntungan, yakni memberikan kontribusi terhadap peningkatan kompetensi para pem- buat keputusan melalui pengembangan pembuatan kebijakan yang berkualitas, bahwa kondisi yang ada pada awal kolaborasi dapat memfasilitasi atau menghambat kerja sama di antara para pemangku kepentingan dan antara lembaga dan pemangku kepentingan. sumber daya untuk berpartisipasi, atau untuk berpartisipasi secara setara dengan pemangku kepentingan lainnya, proses tata kelola kolaboratif akan rentan terhadap manipulasi oleh aktor yang lebih kuat. Hasil observasi dan pengamatan di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa sampah yang berada di pasar tersebut belum dikelola dengan baik. Hal ini ditunjukkan dari penumpukan sampah dan daya tampung (TPS) yang kurang memadai di pasar sehingga sampah tercecer dimana-mana. Di sisi lain pola perilaku pengguna pasar yang belum dan cenderung tidak memiliki kesadaran untuk menjaga kebersihan besrama dan partisipasi dalam pengelolaan sampah masih kurang dan terabaikan, Karakteristik sampah di Kota Bandung terdiri dari sampah Organik (Sisa-sisamakanan, sayur-sayuran, buah-buahan) dan sampah Anorganik (plastik, alumunium, logam). Dari hasil penelitian dapat dikemukakan bahwa bahwa secara umum karakteristik sampah masih dominan sampah organik yang sebetulnya sangat mudah di oleh untuk kepentingan pembangunan lingkungan; Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi partisipasi public dalam pengelolaan sampah di Kota Bandung dengan model sister city menunjukan bahwa faktor internal (pendidikan, pendapatan, kepedulian terhadap sampah, pengetahuan tentang sampah) sementara pengetahuan tentang sampah pada aspek (Jenis sampah) tidak mempengaruhi tingkat partisipasi public, demikian juga faktor eksternal meliputi (peraturan, bimbingan dan penyuluhan, dan fasilitas teknologi); Kondisi lingkungan (kondisi drainase) tidak mempengaruhi tingkat partisipasi public. Berjalan Ketika curah hujan tinggi dan banjir yang setiap tahun teralami. Memang perlunya meningkatkan sumber daya.Downloads
References
Abdelhadi, A. W., H. S. Adam, Mohamed A. Hassan, and Takeshi Hata. 2004. Participatory management: Would it be a turning point in the history of the Gezira Scheme? Irrigation and Drainage 53:429–36.
Alexander, Jeffery A., Maureen E. Comfort, Bryan J. Weiner. 1998. Governance in public-private community health partnerships: A survey of the Community Care Network: SM demonstration sites. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 8:231–332.
Andranovich, Greg. 1995. Achieving consensus in public decision making: Applying interest based problem-solving to the challenges of intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Research 31:429–45.
Ansell, Christopher K. 2003. Community embeddedness and collaborative governance in the San Francisco bay area environmental movement. In Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action, ed. Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, 123–44. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Beierle, Thomas C. 2000. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions: Lessons from the case study record. Discussion Paper 00-56, Resources for the Future.
Beierle, Thomas C., and David Konisky. 2001. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19:515–27.
Beierle, Thomas C., and Rebecca J. Long. 1999. Chilling collaboration: The Federal Advisory Committee Act and stakeholder involvement in environmental decisionmaking. Environmental Law Reporter 29:10399.
Bentrup, Gary. 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: A case study of analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27:739–48.
Blatner, Keith, Matthew Carroll, Steven Daniels, and Greg Walker. 2001. Evaluating the application of collaborative learning to the Wenatchee fire recovery planning effort. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21:241–70.
Booher, David E., and Judith Innes. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:221–36.
Borrini-Feyerabend, Grazia. 1996. Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN–The World Conservation Union.
Bouwen, Rene, and Tharsi Taillieu. 2004. Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14:137–53.
Bradford, Neil. 1998. Prospects for associative governance: Lessons from Ontario, Canada. Politics & Society 26:539–73.
Brinkerhoff, Derick W. 1999. Exploring state-civil society collaboration: Policy partnershipsin developing countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (Suppl. 1):59–86.
Brown, A. J. 2002. Collaborative governance versus constitutional politics: Decision rules for sustainability from Australia’s South East Queensland forest agreement. Environmental Science and Policy 5:19–32.
Bryson, John M., and Barbara C. Crosby. 1992. Leadership for the common good. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Bryson, John M., Gary Cunningham, and Karen Lokkesmoe. 2002. What to do when stakeholders matter: The case of problem formulation for the African American Men Project of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Public Administration Review 62:568–84.
Buanes, Arild, Svein Jentoft, Geir Runar Karlsen, Anita Maurstad, and Siri Søreng. 2004. In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning. Ocean & Coastal Management 47:207–23.
Burger, Joanna, Michael Gochfeld, Charles W. Powers, Lynn Waishwell, Camilla Warren, and
Bernard D. Goldstein. 2001. Science, policy, stakeholders, and fish consumption advisories: Developing a fish fact sheet for Savannah River. Environmental Management 27: 501–14.
Busenberg, George. 1999. Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy. Policy Sciences 32:1–11.
Carter, Jane, Brieke Steenhof, Esther Haldimann, and Nurlan Akenshaev. 2003. Collaborative forest management in Kyrgyzstan: Moving from top-down to bottom-up decisionmaking. Gatekeeper Series No. 108, International Institute for Environment and Development.
Chrislip, David, and Carl E. Larson. 1994. Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Coggins, Goerge C. 1999. Regulating federal natural resources: A summary case against devolved collaboration. Ecology Law Quarterly 25:602.
Coglianese, Cary. 1997. Assessing consensus: The promise and the performance of negotiated rulemaking. Duke Law Journal 46:1255.
Coglianese, Cary, and Laurie K. Allen. 2003. Building sector-based consensus: A review of the EPA’s Common Sense Initiative. Working Paper RWPO3, JFK School of Government.
Conley, Alexander, and Margaret A. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 16:371–86.
Dunn, William N. 1999. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. (Edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press.
Dwijowijoto, Riant Nugroho. 2003. Kebijakan Publik : Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
Landry, Charles. 2008. Creative city: a toolkit for urban innovation. London: Earthscan
Moleong, Lexy J., 2004, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung, Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nugroho, Riant, 2014, Kebijakan Publik di Negara-negara Berkembang, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.
Nugroho, Riant, 2012, Public Policy, Jakarta, PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Sugiyono, 2011, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods), Alfabeta, Bandung.
Jurnal, Sister City,Mukti 2013
Peraturan Perundang-undangan :
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 32 tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup
permendagri nomor 1 tahun 1992 tentang kerjasama sister city
peraturan menteri dalam negeri nomor 3 tahun 2008 tentang pedoman pelaksanaan kerjasama pemerintah daerah dengan pihak luar negeri
UU-18/2008 tentang Pengelolaan Sampah
Internet :
(http://penataanruang.pu.go.id).
http://mongabay.co.id
http://pdkebersihan.bandung.go.id
http://bdg.ksln.co.id
http://bplhkotabandung.com
