PENGARUH KOORDINASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PEMUNGUT PBB PADA KECAMATAN PATARUMAN KOTA BANJAR

Authors

  • Benyamin Harits Universitas Pasundan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v11i2.2895

Keywords:

public administration, Coordination, employee performance

Abstract

This research based on main problem, that is the low of Employee Performance. These conditions predicted because of has not implemented yet of Coordination elements at PBB collector (Land and Building Tax) in Pataruman District, Banjar City. Approach in this research about Coordination and Employee Performance from Public Policy and Public Administration as master theory to develop science area of public administration. Research method is explanatory survey descriptive. This method used to explain social phenomenon which in this case used to check influence of Coordination (X) as independent variable to employee performance (Y) as dependent variable. This research use quantitative analysis usage Path Analysis Method meant to know value of influence Coordination variable to Employee Performance at PBB collector (Land and Building Tax) in Pataruman District, Banjar City either through simultan and also by parsial. Result of research indicate that by simultan, influence of Coordination (X) to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 60,48%. As for influence of other variable to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 39,52%. While by partial, influence of Coordination (X) which consist of six Coordination elements covering: element of Units (X1) have a non significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to -0,31%, element of Sources (Potency) (X2) have a non significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 16,31%, element of Cohesion (X3) have a significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 23,24%, element of Motion Activity (X4) have a non significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to -5,51%, element of Harmony (X5) have a significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 13,62% and element of Same Direction (Target) (X6) have a significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 13,11%. From six Coordination elements that giving dominant influence by parsial to Employee Performance is element of Cohesion (X3) that have a significance effect to Employee Performance (Y) equal to 23,24%. Researcher can conclude that Coordination influentialy in positive and significance to Employee Performance at PBB collector (Land and Building Tax) in Pataruman District, Banjar City. That accross the board Coordination has been executed and implemented according to Employee Performance factors

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Rasjid, Harun. 1994. Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) Sebagai Sarana Statistika Dalam Analisis Kausal. Bandung: LP3ES Fakultas Ekonomi UNPAD.

Hamali, Arif Yusuf. 2016. Pemahaman Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

Handoko, T. Hani. 2003. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Iskandar. 2001. Metode Penelitian Survey. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Mahmudi. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.

Mahsun, Mohammad. 2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.

Mangkunegara, Anwar. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Moeheriono. 2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2003. Kybernology (Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nasucha, Chaizi. 2004. Reformasi Administrasi Publik: Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Nazir, Mohammad. 2011. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Nitisemito, Alex. 1983. Manajemen Suatu Pengantar dan Dasar. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Panggabean, S. Mutiara. 2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Kedua. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Putra, Fadillah. 2001. Paradigma Kritis Dalam Studi Kebijakan Publik, Perubahan dan Inovasi Kebijakan dan Ruang

Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Proses Kebijakan Publik. Surabaya: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rivai, Veithzal. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sedarmayanti. 2009. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Siagian, Sondang P. 1994. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Insani. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2002. Fungsi-fungsi

Manajerial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Siagian, Sondang P. 2007. Filsafat

Administrasi. Jakarta: Haji Mas Agung. Singarimbun, Masri dan Sofian Effendi. 1982.

Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Sudarmanto. 2009 Kinerja dan Pengembangan Kompetensi SDM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sugandha, Dann. 1991. Koordinasi Alat Pemersatu Gerak Administrasi. Jakarta: Intermedia.

Sugandha. 1998. Dasar-dasar Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Sugiono. 1992. Metoda Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sule, Ernie Tisnawati dan Saefullah. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Kelima. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Suradinata, Ernmaya. 1993. Kebijakan, Keputusan dan Kebijaksanaan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sutarto. 1988. Dasar-Dasar Organisasi. Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Sutrisno, Edy. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group.

Wahab, Abdul Solihin. 1997. Analisis Kebijaksanaan Dari Formulasi Ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Widodo, Joko. 2005. Membangun Birokrasi Berbasis Kinerja. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.

Winarno, Budi. 2002. Teori dan Proses

Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: MedPress.

Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Kecamatan Pataruman Kota Banjar Tahun 2018.

Peraturan Walikota Banjar Nomor 29 Tahun 2010 tentang Tugas Pokok, Fungsi dan Tata Kerja Unsur Organisasi Kecamatan di Wilayah Kota Banjar.

Peraturan Walikota Banjar Nomor 30 Tahun 2016 tentang Susunan Organisasi, Tata Kerja, Kedudukan, Tugas Pokok dan Fungsi Perangkat Daerah.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-01