Interactive Digital Teaching Material Konsep Metabolise dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Decision Making dan Problem Solving: Interactive Digital Teaching Material Konsep Metabolise dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Decision Making dan Problem Solving

Cita Tresnawati; Adi Rahmat; Taufik Rahman; Kusnadi

doi:10.23969/biosfer.v9i2.20509

Authors

Cita Tresnawati Universitas Pasundan
Adi Rahmat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Taufik Rahman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Kusnadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v9i2.20509

Keywords:

Kata Kunci : Decision Making, Interactive Digital Teaching Material, Konsep Metabolisme Problem Solving

Abstract

Pembelajaran digital telah memberikan peran penting dalam menjembatani belajar konsep, media ini dirancang dengan memfokuskan pada aktivitas belajar yang dapat mengarahkan pada kemampuan berpikir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi efektivitas penggunaan media Interactive Digital Teaching Material (IDTM) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan decision making dan problem solving mahasiswa konsep metabolisme. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain pre-eksperimen one group pretest-posttest, dengan subjek sebanyak 36 mahasiswa semester III di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi. Kemampuan pengambilan keputusan dan pemecahan masalah diukur melalui aktivitas mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan studi kasus yang tersedia pada IDTM. Instrumen yang digunakan : 1. instrumen lembar kerja mahasiswa dan instrumen test masing-masing sebanyak 2 soal. Hasil menunjukkan kemampuan pengambilan keputusan dan pemecahan masalah memperoleh nilai n-gain 56,19 dan 56,25 pada kriteria cukup efektif dan pada taraf signifikasi (α 0,05) IDTM memberikan peningkatan yang sangat signifikan. Hal tersebut menunjukkan pembelajaran melalui IDTM mengarahkan aktivitas pembelajaran seperti mengamati, mendeskripsikan tabel, mendiskusikan berbagai variabel, menganalisis hubungan antara faktor penyebab dan variabel, mengevaluasi data, mengidentifikasi pola, serta membuat kesimpulan ilmiah. Belajar melalui Fitur studi kasus di IDTM membantu mahasiswa mengintegrasikan pengetahuan teoretis dengan konteks nyata, meningkatkan keterampilan analitis, evaluatif, kolaborati sehingga berpotensi menjadi media pembelajaran efektif untuk mengembangkan kemampuan decision making dan problem solving.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312

Abuhassna, H., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Kosnin, A. B. M., & Darwish, M. (2020). Development of a new model on utilizing online learning platforms to improve students’ academic achievements and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00216-z

Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The Use of a Creative Problem Solving Based Genetic Mutation Module in Higher Education. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33

Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2024). An Evaluation of the Impact of Digital Technology Innovations on Students’ Learning: Participatory Research Using a Student-Centred Approach. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09619-5

Buranasinvattanakul, K. (2024). The Development of Instruction Media in Board Game to Enhance the Capability in the Development of Thai Textbook and the Happiness in Learning for Undergraduate Students. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n2p161

Butterworth, J., & Thwaites, G. (2013). Thinking Skills : Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. In Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263658506948024

Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F., & Tarmo, A. P. (2022). Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching and Learning Biology: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.1

Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2

Chaves, G. L., Batista, R. S., de Sousa Cunha, J., Altmann, D. L., & da Silva, A. J. (2022). Teaching cellular metabolism using metabolic model simulations. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38(September 2021), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.12.001

Çimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective : S tudents ’ views. 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205

Duschl, R. A. (2020). Practical reasoning and decision making in science: Struggles for truth. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1784735

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594

Firetto, C. M., & Van Meter, P. N. (2018). Inspiring integration in college students reading multiple biology texts. Learning and Individual Differences, 65(February), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.011

Heard, J., Scoular, C., Duckworth, D., Ramalingam, D., & Teo, I. (2020). Critical Thinking : Skill Development Framework. Australian Council for Educational Research, September 2021, 1–23.

Jhon R, M., & Prestoza. (2024). Assessing remote learning’s feasibility: A comprehensive analysis of Philippine public-school teachers’ use of learning management systems and blended learning approaches. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 14(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol14.1.3.2024

Kostas, K., & Reiss, J. M. (eds). (2018). Teaching Biology in Schools : Global Research, Issues, and Trends. In Routledge: Vol. o. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110158

Kottmeyer, A. M., Meter, P. Van, & Cameron, C. (2020). How we teach: Generalizable education research: Diagram comprehension ability of college students in an introductory biology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1152/ADVAN.00146.2018

MacDonald, C. J., Backhaus, I., Vanezi, E., Yeratziotis, A., Clendinneng, D., Seriola, L., Häkkinen, S., Cassar, M., Mettouris, C., & Papadopoulos, G. A. (2024). European Union Digital Education quality standard framework and companion evaluation toolkit. Open Learning, 39(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1936476

Minda, J. P. (2015). The Psychology of Thinking: Reasoning, Decision-Making, and Problem-Solving. In Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716661121

Morris, N. P., & Lambe, J. (2017). Multimedia interactive eBooks in laboratory bioscience education. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2017.1338531

Nikolić, N., & Antonijević, R. (2024). Problem-Solving in Biology Teaching: Students’ Activities and Their Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10407-5

Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital Distractions from the Point of View of Higher Education Students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076044

Ravenscroft, A., & McAlister, S. (2006). Digital Games and Learning in Cyberspace: A Dialogical Approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2006.3.1.37

Reyna, J., Hanham, J., & Meier, P. (2017). A taxonomy of digital media types for Learner-Generated Digital Media assignments. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(6), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017752973

Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7

Torkar, G., Veldin, M., Glažar, S. A., & Podlesek, A. (2018). Why do Plants Wilt? Investigating students’ understanding of water balance in plants with external representations at the macroscopic and submicroscopic levels. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2265–2276. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/87119

Treagust, D. F., Tsui, C. Y., & (Eds.). (2013). Multiple Representations in Biological Education,. In Springer Science & Business Media.

Tresnawati, C., Rahmat, A., & Rahman, T. (2022). Cognitive System Profile of Prospective Teachers in Cell Biology Learning. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17, 58–66.

Tresnawati, C., Rahmat, A., Rahman, T., & Kusnadi, K. (2024). The Potential Interactive Digital Teaching Material on Cell Metabolism as a Bridge of Cognitive Processes Toward Student Learning Achievement. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), 1322–1330. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.6398

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. John Wiley & Sons.

Weng, C., Otanga, S., Christianto, S. M., & Chu, R. J. C. (2020). Enhancing Students’ Biology Learning by Using Augmented Reality as a Learning Supplement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119884213

Wikanta, W., & Susilo, H. (2022). Higher Order Thinking Skills Achievement for Biology Education Students in Case-Based Biochemistry Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15445a

Zhou, C. (Ed). (2017). Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education. IGI Global.

Interactive Digital Teaching Material Konsep Metabolise dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Decision Making dan Problem Solving