PENELITIAN HUKUM TRANSFORMATIF PARTISIPATORIS: SEBUAH GAGASAN DAN KONSEP AWAL

Anthon Freddy Susanto (1) , Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara (2)
(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung , Indonesia
(2) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung , Indonesia

Abstract

Normative legal research-dogmatiek, and empirically-quantitative have a tendency to simplification is a waiver of the various aspects of the legal reality is complex, so the legal research dried aspects of values, symbols, meanings of cultural and human morality, do not even have a stunt action in therein. Dogmatiek normative-legal research and quantitative empirical research (both under the paradigm of legal positivism) only describes the relationship (mechanical) between the figures with the rules, principles and rigid principles. Abandonment-waiver so the result, damage to the legal system, social order, and the shattered lives of ecological (environmental) policies by formal law, more favorable power. We find a small community marginalization, displacement and judgment on behalf of the law that many countries do. Legal development that lead to the interests of a particular class or group that is powerful in society. On the one hand the construction of the law is too focused on policy and laws in effect only showing the construction of artificial, although the legislation that has a purpose a lofty goal, but minimal in achievement, especially were always raised to be behavior that appears in the legislation ,
Legal development was too focused on legislation that does not encourage participation public.Hukum lose the ability to explain their relationships with the community and cultural realities and ultimately the law fail to become a medium that can increase participation masyarakat.Dari various legal problems today, shows us, is required approach that is able to respond to change and certainly empowering communities that do not mampu.Oleh therefore legal research should be able to encourage community participation, open to a wide variety of approaches so as to provide a variety of solutions faced by society.
Keywords: Concepts, Law Transformative Research-Participatory.

Full Article

Generated from XML file

References

BUKU

Agus Salim. 2001. Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial (Dari Denzin Guba dan Penerapannya. Jogjakarta. Tiara Wacana.

Andre A. Hardjana. April 1999. Perkembangan Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi di Perguruan Tinggi; Catatan Pendahuluan, Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, Bandung. Remadja RosdaKarya.

Anton Bekker dan Achmad Charris Zubair.1990. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. 2004. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta. Raja Grafindo.

Anthon F. Susanto. 2010. Dekonstruksi Hukum, Eksplorasi Teks dan Model Pembacaan. Jogjakarta. Genta Publishing.

Anthon F. Susanto. 2010. Ilmu Hukum Non-Sistematik, Fundasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Jogjakarta. Genta Publishing.

Arief Subyantoro dan FX.Suwarto. 2007. Metode & teknik Penelitian Sosial, Jakarta.Andi.

Ali Harb. 2004. Kritik Kebenaran, Jogjakarta. LKiS.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. 2004. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Anton Bakker dan Achmad Charris Zubair. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Filsafat, Jakarta. Kanisius.

Bell, Judith. 2006. Doing your Research Project; A Guide for first-time Researchers in Education Health and Social Science, Jakarta. Indeks.

Bogdan, Robert & Taylor Steven J. 1993. Kualitatif; Dasar-Dasar Penelitian, Usaha Nasional Surabaya, Indonesia.

Bertens, K., 1981. Filsafat Barat dalam Abad XX. Jakarta, Gramedia.

Capra, Frijof. 2004. Titik balik Peradaban, Jogjakarta. Bentang.

Chalmers, AF. 1983. Apa itu yang dinamakan Ilmu?; Suatu Penilaian tentang Watak dan Status Ilmu serta Metodenya, Jakarta. Hasta Mitra.

Creswell, John. W.,& Plano Clark. 2007. Disigning and Conducting Mixed Method Research, Thousand Oaks, C.A. Sage.

Craig, G. dan M. Mayo. 1995. Community empowerment; a reader in partisipation and development. London, Zed Books.

Creswell, John W. 2010. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mix; Jogjakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, John W., Cresswell. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches, Sage Publication.

Cohen – Mitchell, J.B. 2000.Disabled woman in ElSavador refraining themselves; An economic development program for woman. In. C. Truman, D.M. Mertens, & B. Humphries (Ed.), Research and inequality (pp.143-176). London. Taylor & Francis.

Drew, 1980. Introduction toDesigning and Conducting Research, 2nd Missouri, CB; Mosby Company.

Edi Suharto. 2005. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat; Kajian strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial dan Pekerjaan Sosial, Bandung. Refika Aditama.

Fuad Hasan, Koencaraningrat.1991. Beberapa Asas Metodologi Ilmiah, dalam Koentjaraningrat, Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Fred. N. Kerlinger. 1998. Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral, Jogjakarta, Gadjah Mada University Press.

Fuad Hasan, Koencaraningrat. 1991. Beberapa Asas Metodologi Ilmiah, dalam Koentjaraningrat, Metode-Metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta. Gramedia.

Guba & Lincoln. 1994. dalam “Competing Paradigm in Qualitative Research ini Denzin and Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research London.

Herriot, R.E. & W.A. Firestone. 1983. Multisite qualitative Policy Research; Optimizing description and generalizability; Educational Research Methods 12 (2).

Irmayanti M. Budianto, 2005. (Realitas dan Objektivitas; Refleksi kritis atas Cara Kerja Ilmiah, Jakarta. Wedatama Widya Sastra.

Ife,Jim. 1995. Community Development; Creating Community Alternative,Visions, Analysis and Practice, Australia Longman.

Johnny Ibrahim. 2006. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang. Bayumedia.

Jonathan Sarwono, 2011. Mix Methods, Cara menggabung Risep Kuantitatif dan Riset Kualitatif secara benar. Jakarta. Elek Komputindo.

Lexy J, Moleong.1999. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Liek Wilardjo. 1990. Realita dan Desiderata, Yogyakarta. Duta Wacana University Press.

Madison, A.M. 2000. Language in defining social problem and in evaluating social programs in R. Hopson (Ed.) How and why language matters in evaluation (New direction in evaluation. No. 86. Pp. 17-28). San Fransico – Jossey-Bass.

Miles,Matthew B.dan A.Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif, Jakarta. UI-Press.

Mukti Fadjar & Yulianto Achmad. 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Jogjakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Mikkelsen, Britha, 2011. Metode Penelitian Partisipatoris dan Upaya Pemberdayaan; Panduan bagi Praktisi lapangan, Pustaka Obor Indoensia.

Mertens, DM. 2003. Mixed Method and the Politics of Human Research; The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In Tashakkori & C. Teddli (Ed), Handbook og Mix Method in The Social & behavioural Sciences (pp. 135-164). Thousand Oaks. CA. Sage.

Philips, DC. & NC.Burbules. 2000. Postpositivism and Educational Research, Lanham, NY; Rowman & Littlefield.

Podgorecki, Adam & Christopher J. Whelan. 1987. Pendekatan Sosiaologis terhadap Hukum. Jakarta. Bina Aksara.

Pranarka dan Vidhyadinka dalam Herry Hikmat, 2006. Strategi Pembardayaan Masyarakat. Bandung. HuManiora Pratama.

Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta. Kencana.

Ritzer, George. 1992. Sosiologi Ilmu Pengetahuan berparadigma Ganda, Jakarta. Rajawali Pers.

Rappaport. 1985. Terms of Empowerment Language, Social Policy, No. 17, 15-21.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. 1994. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta. Ghalia Indonesia.

Snijders, Adelbert. 2006. Manusia Kebenaran. Jakara. Kanisius.

S. Nasution.1992. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif, Bandung. Tarsito.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 1995. Penelitian Hukum Normatif; Suatu Tinjuan Singkat. Jakarta. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Ulber Silalahi. 2009. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung. Refika Aditama.

Van Melsen, A.G. 1961. Science and Technology, Pittsburgh; Duquesne University Press.

JURNAL

Ardle, J. Mc. 1989.Community Development Tools of Trade, Community Quarterly Journl Vol. 16.

Jalaludin Rakhmat, 1999. Kritik Paradigma Pasca Positivistik terhadap Positivisme, Jurnal Komunikasi, Volume III, April.

Smith, A.G. & K.S. Louis, 1982. Multimethod policy research: Issues and Aplications, American Behavioural Scientists, 26 (1).

Winston, Tellis.1997. “Introduction to Case Study”, the Qualitative Report, Volume 3, Number 2, July, (http://www.nova.edu/sss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html).

MAKALAH

Liek Wilardjo, 2003. Meluruskan Jalan Reformasi; Perpektif kebijakan Sains dan Teknologi untuk Mendukung Masyarakat Industri, Seminar Nasional, UGM, 25 – 27 September.

Satjipto Rahardjo. 2000. Mengajarkan Keteraturan Menemukan Ketidakteraturan (Teaching Order Finding Disorder); Tigapuluh tahun perjalanan intelektual dari Bojong ke Pleburan; Pidato mengakhiri masa Jabatan sebagai Guru Besar tetap Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Pleburan 15 Desember.

Soetandyo Wignyosoebroto. 1994. Masalah Metodologik dalam Penelitian Hukum Sehubungan dengan Masalah Keragaman Pendekatan konseptualnya, Makalah rujukan disajikan dalam acara pertemuan “forum komunikasi Hasil Penelitian Bidang Hukum yang diselenggarakan di Hotel Kencana Bandungan, Kab Semarang pada tanggal 5 – 8 Desember.

Authors

Anthon Freddy Susanto
anthon.aiki@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara
Author Biographies

Anthon Freddy Susanto, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan Bandung

Dosen Fakultas Hukum Unpas

Article Details