EKSAMINASI (LEGAL ANNOTATION) SEBAGAI PINTU MASUK PROSES REFORMASI LEMBAGA PERADILAN

Abstract

Judge's verdict is independent. In practice appears the term such as "mob justice or judicial corruption", so that the verdict is often injustice, impartial to the public's sense, because there are still many controversial decisions and deviate from the legal substance (material or formal), for it needs to be studied or tested further against such decision to the public (academics, NGOs, and practitioners), and the results need to be published. The goal is to find or to know the judge irresponsibility in giving judgment; this is in line with the reform era that demands for freedom, and openness (transparency). Provide transparency to the public space for social control, which avoids the manipulation of facts, abuse of power, and dishonesty. Examination is expected to be the entrance of the reform process in the judiciary, as well as to assess the extent of the professionalism and credibility of a judge in carrying out the task or profession.
Keywords: Examination, Reform, Judiciary.