ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS KOMUNIKASI VERBAL PADA DEBAT CALON GUBERNUR DAN WAKIL GUBERNUR JAWA TIMUR 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/linimasa.v3i2.2639Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, Political Debates, Local Elections, CampaignAbstract
ABSTRACT This thesis discusses political debates at the regional level, especially in East Java Province in 2018. The focus of the study is the strengths and weaknesses of candidates in presenting an empirical data or facts as knowledge in argumentation. From these problems, this study uses a qualitative approach with critical discourse analysis methods to examine texts in depth. This research combines two theories, functional theory of political campaign discourse (attacks, acclaims, defenses) by W.L. Benoit and power & Knowledge by Michel Foucault. From the results of this study, candidate No.1 (Khofifah Indar Parawansa & Emil Elestianto Dardak) strongly gave an attack to candidate No. 2 (Saifullah Yusuf and Puti Guntur Soekarno) based on strong empirical data or facts, as a form of knowledge that gives the effect of power in argumentation (powerfull argumentation). But on the other hand, candidate No.2 not strong in making a defense from an opponent's attack. The weaknesses for candidate No.2 are judged by the lack of data or empirical facts used in argument, so that it gives the effect of a powerless argumentationDownloads
References
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Ardiansah, M. F. (2018). Retrieved from https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bapala/article/view/22608
Aritonang, A. I. (2018). Gaya Retorika Pasangan Cagub dan Cawagub DKI Dalam Debat Politik. Jurnal KOMUNIKATIF, 154-187.
Barbaros, C. (2012). Exploring Televised Political Debates: Strategies and Issues. Argumentum: Journal the Seminar of Discursive Logic, Argumentation Theory & Rhetoric, 10, 140-149.
Benoit, W. L., Pier, P. M., Brazeal, L. M., McHale, J. P., Klyukovski, A., & Airne, D. (2001). The Primary Decision: A Functional Analysis of Debates in Presidential Primaries (Vol. 38). London: Praeger.
Carlin, D. P. (1992). Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments. Political Communication, 9, 251-265.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dosi, E. (2012). Media Massa Dalam Jaring Kekuasaan: Sebuah Studi Tentang Relasi Kekuasaan di Balik Wacana. Maumere: Ledalero.
Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana. Yogyakarta: LKiS.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analyisis The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies, 177-197.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gee, J. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
Gronbeck, B. E. (2004). Rhetoric and Politic. In L. L. Kaid, Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 167-193). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hardyanti, N. (2015, April 1). Retrieved from http://id.portalgaruda.org/?ref=browse&mod=viewarticle&article=334477
Istiqomah, R. R. (2013). Kampanye Politik di Televisi sebagai Budaya Populer. Jurnal Interaksi, 2, 90-97.
McKinney, M. S., & Spialek, M. L. (2017). Political Debates. In M. Allen (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1272-1276). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Oktaviani, R. C. (2013). Retrieved from http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=pdf/abstrak/id_abstrak-20365015.pdf
Paatelainen, L., Croucher, S., & Benoit, B. (2016). A Functional Analysis of the Finnish 2012 Presidential Elections. Studies in Media and Communication, 4, 70-80.
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Pfau, M. (1983). Criteria and Format to Optimize Political Debates: An Analysis of South Dakota's “Election '80” Series. The Journal of the American Forensic Association, 19, 205-214.
